Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 15, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 26 <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated staff has drafted Resolution 5386, which would allow for the <br /> Wetland Buffer Permit to construct the driveway according to the plans, with a 10-foot <br /> encroachment into the buffer area. <br /> The applicant was present. <br /> Council Member Marty stated it appeared the applicant might be able to construct the driveway <br /> along the southern edge of Laport Drive, however, this would still result in the loss of a tree. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson explained that in addition to this, the residents located on the corner <br /> of Edgewood and Laport Drives are mowing into that area. He pointed out that if the driveway <br /> runs along the property line, it would also run along somebody's sideyard, and the applicant was <br /> attempting to remain at a distance from the neighbors. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Coughlin. To Approve Resolution 5386, a Resolution Approving a <br /> Wetland Buffer Permit for Spencer Mistelske, 2442 Laport Drive, Planning Case 575-99. <br /> Pam DeGross, 8133 Woodlawn Drive, stated her property backs up to the proposed site. She <br /> stated they were not notified of this proposal until the previous week, when the survey was being <br /> conducted on the land, and there is a 30-foot encroachment of the survey onto their land. She <br /> stated the City plat indicates their land would not be affected at all if the applicant is permitted to <br /> build on this site, because Favor Street is half the size of a regular street. <br /> Mrs. DeGross stated she was opposed to the applicant constructing a driveway upon the <br /> wetlands, as they are very important to her family. She commented she was unaware what the <br /> Environmental Protection Agency would have to say in regard to this proposal, particularly in <br /> light of the proposed building location. She inquired regarding fire truck access, in the event of a <br /> fire in this area. She stated if the driveway is as small as proposed, with many large of trees, <br /> how would the fire trucks get through. She requested the Council consider this matter carefully, <br /> adding that she was very concerned with the entire situation. <br /> Mrs. DeGross stated the matter most upsetting to her is that the City has been conducting tests all <br /> summer long in the woods, and she has inquired what is occurring, however, no one informed <br /> them. She stated the City would be giving up great wetland for a new house, and there are <br /> already so many houses in the City. She stated there were many other lots that are buildable, that <br /> would not take wetlands. She explained there were many deer in this area, and a large variety of <br /> birds. She stated if the City desired to do something with this land, they should construct a <br /> walking path through it, so that everyone can enjoy it, however, they should not ruin it for one <br /> house. <br /> Mrs. DeGross stated the applicant would be constructing the driveway on an area that should be <br /> a road, and if it is going to be a road, curbs and gutters should be installed, not just a driveway. <br /> She stated this did not make sense to her. She requested the survey be redone, prior to any <br /> construction on the site. <br /> Council Member Stigney requested clarification of the location of Mrs. DeGross's property, in <br /> relation to the proposed site. <br /> Mrs. DeGross stated her home was located directly to the west. <br />