Laserfiche WebLink
NOv-10-99 05 :38 PM P. 06 <br /> • <br /> DATA FORM <br /> ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD <br /> Soil Pit 1-A <br /> Field Investigator(s); Arlig bate: August 5. 1999 <br /> County: RAMSEY Plant Community:Type 3 <br /> Site Information: Cedar Ridge Homes Plant Community at this Point:Type 6 characteristics <br /> Mounds View, MN MN DNR no NvVI PEMCd/PFO1Cd <br /> Environmental conditions at the plant community: Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been sipiificantly <br /> disturbed: Yes ,•L_ motile in dredne spoil are(, <br /> Comments; Ditch on west edge of site conveys water from the area and the basin into a culvert (all part of drainage <br /> easement Lon Lake Road on west ed:a o the wetland. <br /> - r _•. ._....uas.-. „......_..., ,..a: ,....,. n_.)4..',1. a.•u..��x T,he1�! 1y S�dr <br /> ditch <br /> h 8ila/I7Litetweb <br /> l the road, <br /> andb. ..d <br /> basin. <br /> • TEiI'+1�i <br /> DOMINANT VEGETATION <br /> Common Name Species Name % Cover Indicator S:a:us Stratum <br /> 1.Reed canary grass Phalaris arundinacea 40• FACW+ grass/herb <br /> 2.Jewelweed Impatiens eapensis 35% FACW forb/herb <br /> 3.Silky dogwood Cornus amomum 15% FACW+ shrub <br /> 4.Wild cherry Prunus spp? <10% FACU shrub <br /> 5.Trembling aspen Populus tremule <10% FAC tree/shrub <br /> 6. Slippery elm Ulmus rubra <10% FAC shrub <br /> 7. - <br /> S. <br /> 9, <br /> Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100% of domittauts <br /> Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met?Yes N.) <br /> Rationale: More than 50% h dro•h es ditch nearb has ilowin 3” dee• water, duckweed in stagn.at areas <br /> il. i� sY �' 1` '..a .� { I na. ! .�e.• 9•.'f.:. r:.t t- a" ,r #( . � .`t 't t r - .ri-; <br /> .r.. r _..I ,.LJr..¢.C.0 rL,la.:r,Cu.l u•, xlf IE tYILL.... .., ' .,.� #•.. •... .jr._ ::. _ tin i'?n�"'a''�'t t444e.,.-.r,t..b;.11•..,,..11 <br /> SOILS <br /> Series/phase: Seelveville muck Subgroup: 1'vnic barosattrists <br /> Is the soil on the hydric soils list?Yes,Th-_ No Undeterntincd <br /> Is the soil a Histosol?Yes Histic epipedon present? Yes No x <br /> Is the soil: Mottled?Yes_ No x Colors: Glcyed? Yes x No— <br /> Matrix Color: 2/1 on 10YR in top 5". then 3/2 <br /> Other soil characteristics: peaty/mucky, some clay <br /> Is the hydric soil criterion met?Yes_,� No-+ <br /> Rationale: On ma• as wetland /ow chronta or mile _ Y„ <br /> r_ q-. ri — ^:ja t{7LCt :r,4a M].Jt• - �• i.i?,. ��a � i; 774 'i'1;1 s -4 1 i._.1 f` <br /> r 1 a;..•3`•u.L;i f 1 ( }r, 4 ;1 fy +l' s�( �t'r e,� ?x.�;.• {� � t -z �C' .(,m•.„. ; i� I if, <br /> . x <br /> ,.:. ,. ....e .a.: r•{ r II J `'. %. t a ... d• �r..6_..16uJ.a57�3..�tY 1t D:. .r �. t+.2ae .. .. <br /> HYDROLOGY <br /> Is the ground surface inundated?Yes.�_ No Surface water depth: "landing.water 5" dc_;D in ditkncarby <br /> Is the soil saturated?Yes X..` , No <br /> Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole; not found in nit.veru damp at 15" <br /> List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:this area may be dredge spoil, h it sLat:�y feel <br /> Is the wetland hydrology criterion met?Yes x No_•__ <br /> Rationale: Water within a foot of surface <br /> JTJRISDICrIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE <br /> Is the plant community a wetland? Yes,x <br /> Rationale for jurisdictional decision; On NWI , and ALL PARAMETERS MET <br />