|
NOV-10-99 05 :39 PM• P. 07
<br /> DATA FORM
<br /> ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD
<br /> • . Soil Pit 1-3
<br /> Field Investigator(s): Arlig Date: August 5, 1999
<br /> County: RAMSEY Plant Community: Type 3
<br /> Site Information: Cedar Ridge Homes Plant Community at this Point:Type 6
<br /> Mounds View, MN_ MN DNR no NWI FEMCdIY O1Cd
<br /> Environmental conditions at the plant community: Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been si:Itificantly
<br /> disturbed: Yes _g_,_ No _
<br /> Comments: sec 1-A
<br /> f_ ,?�Q'S,l ,
<br /> 311.111
<br /> .,_..•Jb,....-.7a1� ::1._:2,_-°.,!..,:-,.. -Al..•r,....itr::Wrdu ••:.t J _.
<br /> DOMINANT VEGETATION
<br /> Common Name Species Name % Cover Indicator Sta:us Stratum
<br /> 1.Silky dogwood Cornus amomum 35% FACW-t- shrub I
<br /> 2.Jewelweed Impatiens capensis 25% FACW forb/herb
<br /> 3.American raspberry Rubus strigosus 20% FAC\i4'- forb
<br /> --
<br /> 4. Reed canary grass ?haloes arundinacea _ 10% FACW-t- i4 !rass/herb
<br /> S. Common buckthorn Rhamnus cathartics <10% FAC- shrub
<br /> 6.
<br /> ..
<br /> s.
<br /> —
<br /> 9. 1
<br /> Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC 100% of dominants
<br /> Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met?Yes a_ No ,,,,_
<br /> Rationale: more than 50% of dominant s.ecics are h dro'h es.bent trunks on some of the do*wood
<br /> ,t „,';.:.',;;,'1
<br /> .,,. �5<•'"”: '�, `�•, :fin - '-7::.�:1.'wai::. +zT"„Sr 1 �.r .y � I;
<br /> lc?. e e ' j 0{F •'..."fir:;:: y7 '' p,
<br /> `: %.a S 1 r r '.i;: sec E'_.•" :i�i`;'Lt.'=L7_:? -:i3�1.•3a1!_TiC9i:S«,.af__:G:,_..,,n -.J:_« at–...: .b.
<br /> SOILS
<br /> Series/phase: Seclyeville muck * Su)gronp:a Tvuic borosanr;s s
<br /> Series/phase: Urban land-Lino complex , S'abgroup:= _Aauic udJpsammeuts_.
<br /> Is the soil on the hydric soils list?Yes x'` _ No Undetermined
<br /> Is the soil a Histosol?Yes_ No x Histic epipedon present? Yes No x
<br /> Is the soil: Mottled?Yes No x._ Colors: taleyed?Yes No t
<br /> Matrix Color: 2/2 on 10YR with some fibers
<br /> Other soil characteristics: some fibers, sandy material
<br /> Is the hydric soli criterion met?Yes x No�-
<br /> Rationale: Near ed e of ma•.ed h dric soil . ound low chroma and or:anic material
<br /> I
<br /> ,... t- � -.>t.'Lp' ,:::;,,,:',:ii• r ,•il.�. � �
<br /> � _
<br /> •. 1. ,. e 4 I nsi:;.!•:Se?i"Jl3re. Lh ifi._It ]A3 ]. ,N ~ ` e. -- . _
<br /> HYDROLOGY
<br /> 1 Is the ground surface inundated?Yes_ No x Surface water depth: not found
<br /> Is the soil saturated?Yes_ No
<br /> Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: surface looks as_if ha. been wet in past l�e�ris..__
<br /> List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil,saturation: grade change, debris
<br /> r Is the wetland hydrology criterion met?Yes x_ No— •
<br /> Rationale:evidence of water within a loot of surface, .: .: ... •
<br /> JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE
<br /> Is the plant community a wetland?Yes x No_
<br /> ' Rationale for urisdictional decision: ALL
<br /> . . ;.. PARAMETERS
<br /> RAMETERS FOUND
<br /> a: , •0,.t . . J ::1 :;5.t;, (,t,,rri v,ipf; .0L-kii $ ,,VA-Ft ::f417i� . _ { •- ' ixr (-'--41.i,
<br /> r. � a
<br /> 4•., ,.. .r S,,.7.. ,.,, !b :,i.th _:F,`I t,. ,1s ,, . --- c ..~,`r .-'t' �q,._._.. , , .. . , .
<br />
|