Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 22, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 14 <br /> Expending City Funds, the Meetings Will Occur in the Council Chambers, Or in the City Hall <br /> Building. <br /> Council Member Stigney inquired how this policy would apply to the Charter Commission. <br /> Mayor Coughlin stated the Charter Commission is subject to Open Meeting Law, and if they <br /> utilize City facilities of any sort, they would also be subject to this policy. <br /> Council Member Quick inquired if any commission or other bodies of government that expend <br /> City funds would therefore be required to hold their meetings at the City Hall. <br /> Mayor Coughlin stated they would not necessarily be required to hold their meetings in the City <br /> Hall, however, if they did, they would be subject to the policy. <br /> Council Member Quick advised that the City Hall is the seat of government, and many years ago, <br /> meetings of the City Council had been held offsite, which resulted in a problem within the <br /> community, regarding the accessibility to the Council Meetings. He stated he would like staff to <br /> craft verbiage which indicates that if the groups are expending City funds, the meetings will <br /> occur in the Council Chambers, or in the City Hall building. <br /> Mayor Coughlin inquired if the seconder would agree to this amendment. <br /> Council Member Marty agreed. <br /> Council Member Stigney pointed out that the remote broadcasts of meetings such as those at the <br /> Pinewood Elementary School would be contradictory to this. <br /> Mayor Coughlin clarified that this motion was to direct professional legal staff and <br /> administrative staff to draft a resolution to address the foreseeable concerns, after which, the <br /> resolution would be brought before the Council for discussion at a future Work Session. He <br /> explained that if there are additional concerns or suggestions at that time, the Council could <br /> amend the draft resolution. <br /> City Attorney Long stated in his understanding, there were three points for consideration. He <br /> stated that staff would be directed to draft a resolution or ordinance that would require City <br /> related groups subject to Open Meeting Law to meet in the City Hall building, if they are <br /> receiving public funds. He explained that this would exclude certain functions, such as those of <br /> the School District, which are subject to Open Meeting Law, however, do not receive City funds. <br /> City Attorney Long stated the second point pertains to meetings held within the building, which <br /> would be subject to being broadcast, and subject to broadcast availability. He stated he assumed, <br /> therefore, they would not be required to cancel a meeting if staff was not present, and would <br /> simply indicate that staffing was not available to broadcast the meeting when it occurred. <br /> City Attorney Long indicated that a question arises with the issue of attempting to require <br /> meetings be held in the City facility. He explained for example, the Parks and Recreation <br /> Commission does not receive City funds, per se, however, it does receive City staff support, <br /> therefore, language may be required to specifically address this situation. He stated however, the <br />