My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1999/12/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
Agenda Packets - 1999/12/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:43 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 8:36:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/13/1999
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/13/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 22, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 15 <br /> intent appears to pertain to City related functions, and boards and commissions, all of which <br /> would be subject to the policy. <br /> Mayor Coughlin added that the City Attorney could report back to the Council if anything was <br /> found to be untenable in this regard. <br /> Council Member Stigney stated that the Charter Commission meetings consist of a general <br /> meeting, at which all members are present, however, the Commission members then split into <br /> separate committees, which meet in different rooms. He stated he was uncertain how the policy <br /> could be implemented as indicated in the motion. <br /> Council Member Marty explained that generally, after the Charter Commission breaks into <br /> separate groups, they come back together, and the different groups provide a summation of their <br /> discussion. He stated in his opinion, this summation would suffice for broadcasting purposes. <br /> Mayor Coughlin stated they could certainly discuss the particular situation of any individual <br /> group at a later point, however, the goal to be considered is to keep the public informed <br /> regarding anything that relates to them directly or indirectly, and impacts, or has the potential to <br /> impact their lives. <br /> Ayes—4 Nays— 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. <br /> J. Resolution Approving Fee Increases for 2000. <br /> Mayor Coughlin stated this item is the continuation of a motion made at the November 15 City <br /> Council Meeting, by Council Member Marty and Council Member Thomason, and the motion is <br /> again on the floor. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomason. To Approve Resolution No. 5382, a Resolution <br /> Approving Amendment to the City of Mounds View's Uniform Schedule of Fees and Charges, <br /> Exhibit A Attached. <br /> Community Development Director Jopke stated staff has attempted to clarify some confusion at <br /> the previous meeting concerning the provisions of the proposal relating to fee increases. He <br /> stated three items have been revised on Exhibit A of the resolution. He explained that two of the <br /> revisions pertain to the fees charged for Planning Commission mailed agendas, and Planning <br /> Commission mailed minutes, which staff suggests be increased from $10 to $54, and from $20 to <br /> $144, respectively, to reflect actual costs. <br /> Community Development Director Jopke indicated the third revision pertains to the plan check <br /> fees. He stated staff suggests additional plan check fees be charged on those projects that require <br /> substantial staff review. He advised that the new language attached to the resolution indicates <br /> there will be a plan check fee of 65 percent of the permit fee for all commercial permits, <br /> residential permits, new dwellings, dwelling additions, garages, garage additions, decks, sheds <br /> over 216 square feet, and major remodeling of homes. He explained that these projects require a <br /> plan review, and therefore, should require a plan check fee. <br /> Community Development Director Jopke stated other items that require permits, such as roofing, <br /> siding, window replacement, driveways, and fences do not require a plan review by City staff, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.