My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1998/04/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
Agenda Packets - 1998/04/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:39 PM
Creation date
6/15/2018 10:40:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/27/1998
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/27/1998
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br /> ■ST.PAUL,MN O MINNEAPOLIS, MN O Sr.CLOUD, MN 0 CHIPP6WAFALLS,WI o MADISON,WI p LAKE COMM'.IN <br /> TO: Jim Ericson, City of Mounds View <br /> FROM; Rocky J. Keehn <br /> DATE: April 13, 1998 <br /> RE: Anthony Properties Management,Inc./Louise O'Neil <br /> Planning Case 471-97 <br /> SEH File No.A-MOUND9701.00(Pocket File 80.03) <br /> We have completed a review of the above referenced project. Based on our review it is recommended that the City <br /> storm sewer system be eliminated from the site plan (42-inch EQ. RCP, and connecting pipes). Since the <br /> developer's system cannot be connected to the City system, the dual storm sewers are a system which is not cost <br /> effective for the City to have constructed_ If the dual system is replaced with one storm sewer system,over 8 feet <br /> of head(water ponding)would need to be developed in the manhole located on the existing storm sewer system on <br /> the east side of the project. This could cause problems with the upstream storm sewer system. <br /> In the future, a larger storm sewer system in H2 would be more cost effective. This system can use the existing <br /> storm sewer system in Irondale Road,wetland on the west side of the proposed project and tie into the drainage <br /> system on Long Lake Road to reduce the cost of construction. <br /> Recent wetland regulation and Rice Creek Watershed District requirements have made the originally proposed storm <br /> sewer project in the Anthony Properties unfeasible. In the original plan,the storm water from Anthony Properties <br /> was going to be treated at a pond in the southwest corner of Long Lake Road and H,2. With the stricter ponding <br /> requirements,this site would not be large enough. The developer tried to make the proposed system work(at our <br /> request)by using a dual system,but in reviewing the information it is apparent that this is not the best alternative <br /> for the City. <br /> The wetland buffer will be an issue since the site has building within the 100 foot protection area. Natural <br /> vegetation and buffer strip easements should be obtained. With the sediment ponds and easements,the construction <br /> in the buffer area will be mitigated. <br /> Our recommendations are: <br /> Eliminate the City based storm sewer system on the property <br /> r Obtain an Easement in the wetland buffer area of at least 10 feet from the wetland. <br /> if you have any other questions please call be at 490-2026. <br /> RJK/rjk <br /> 51WATER ANON ECIBROCKYNINNUMOSWOUNDVWJE1 <br /> e0021 MHIA saNI1lOw EEE HaS 05TZ 061 ZT9 %y3 Ce.TZ N1S 66/ZT/10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.