My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1998/04/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
Agenda Packets - 1998/04/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:39 PM
Creation date
6/15/2018 10:40:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/27/1998
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/27/1998
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Report <br /> TOLD Development Co. Case#507-97 <br /> January 14, 1998 <br /> Page 3 <br /> intersections of the City in terms of traffic counts, and as such, would be best served by a <br /> commercial land use designation. Of the greatest concern, however, is that the development as <br /> proposed would involve the removal of four single-family homes. Houses on the west side of <br /> Greenwood Drive would then back up to a commercial development instead of more single-family <br /> homes, which is the case currently. The developer has made compensatory offers to the adjoining <br /> six single-family property owners, of whom four have accepted and now are in support of the <br /> project. The impacts of this proposal go beyond the adjoining property owners which necessitates <br /> the following review: <br /> 1. Buffer. The developer has indicated a strong willingness to work with area residents on <br /> making this site as non-intrusive and aesthetically appealing as is possible. It has been proposed <br /> that there would be a wide buffer of 75 to 80 feet between the parking area of the Walgreens and <br /> the residential properties fronting on Greenwood Drive. While this would be a significant buffer <br /> in terms of distance, it would be further enhanced by a number of screening alternatives, such as a <br /> residential style privacy fence, berming, or evergreen and deciduous trees planted to separate the <br /> commercial use from the residences behind it. <br /> 2. Suitability for Residential Development. There is some question whether it is appropriate <br /> to allow any additional residential development adjacent to Highway 10. A previous proposal for <br /> the vacant parcel called for rental townhomes, which was met with strong neighborhood <br /> opposition. The residential goals and policies from the Comprehensive Plan are attached to this <br /> report for reference. <br /> 3. Value as Commercial Property. After purchasing the property, the City attempted to market <br /> its property for a commercial use, but found no interest, presumably due to the access difficulties <br /> and size of the parcel. The City-owned property, when combined with the four residential <br /> properties on Eastwood Road, would become a viable commercial site with its frontage along the <br /> Highway 10 and County Road I, given the premium placed on visibility by high volumes of traffic <br /> and the availability of access from arterial roadways. <br /> 4. Effect on City's Tax Base. The current taxes generated by the four single-family residential <br /> parcels is less than $6,000 annually. The City-owned parcel generates no tax revenue as it is <br /> public land. Using data provided by the developer, the taxes expected to be generated by the <br /> proposed Walgreens would be substantially higher--$66,000 annually. When looking at the <br /> overall picture, the City has a very limited amount of land in commercial zoning or commercial <br /> uses (3.9% in 1990), and an extensive amount of land in single family residential (45.1% in 1990). <br /> One possible goal of land use planning is to balance the types of land uses to create a sustainable <br /> economy and a reasonable level of taxes for services. Commercial uses pay more property taxes <br /> than do single family residential developments. Attached to this report are the goals and policies <br /> regarding commercial development within the City. <br /> 5. Compatibility of Uses; Protection of Residential Neighborhoods. The placement of <br /> different uses adjacent to one another may cause impacts and incompatibilities. Commercial uses <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.