My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1998/04/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
Agenda Packets - 1998/04/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:39 PM
Creation date
6/15/2018 10:40:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/27/1998
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/27/1998
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Report <br /> TOLD Development Co. Case#507-97 <br /> January 14, 1998 <br /> Page 4 <br /> are often seen as creating compatibility problems for adjacent residential neighborhoods. The <br /> applicant has made some changes to the initial design to address the concerns expressed by nearby <br /> residents about buffering and the impact of the proposed use on the single family homes east of <br /> the property. <br /> The Comprehensive Plan is one of the fundamental policy documents used by cities to envision <br /> their desired future. The Comprehensive Plan is a series of choices, and these choices have social, <br /> economic and environmental consequences. In the area of land use, the plan is often used to <br /> balance community desires and the marketplace. The marketplace, for the most part, initiates, <br /> finances and constructs development of homes, businesses, entertainment and leisure uses. Cities <br /> can shape the character of their communities if they translate the vision in the Comprehensive Plan <br /> into development regulations, which then molds what happens in the marketplace. The <br /> marketplace, however, keeps moving and continues to bring ideas to communities which may not <br /> have been anticipate.d by the plan or which differ from the plan. Plans need to be revisited and <br /> updated to keep pace as circumstances change oras opportunities.arise. This request is coming <br /> from the marketplace and presents opportunities and consequences. The City Council, given the <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission, hearing testimony from citizens, the applicant and <br /> staff, must judge whether this new idea works for Mounds View. <br /> B. Rezoning Request <br /> Discussion of Request: As stated above, the Planning Commission in its recommendation to the <br /> City Council considered the following possible adverse effects of the proposed rezoning: <br /> 1. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is inconsistent with the current <br /> Comprehensive Plan designation for this site. Minnesota Statutes require that a proposed <br /> rezoning be consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. If the proposed amendment to the <br /> Comprehensive Plan is approved, the proposal would be consistent. <br /> 2. Surrounding Area. The subject properties form an irregularly shaped parcel bounded Highway <br /> 10 to the west and County Road Ito the south. There is an extensive, existing single family <br /> residential neighborhood to the east and an approved ten-unit townhome development to the <br /> northwest to compliment the existing apartment buildings. South of the site is a fast-food restaurant <br /> and Moundsview Square Shopping Center. Across the highway is a SuperAmerica and Burger King. <br /> In the proposed plans, the residential areas to the east and the north would be buffered from the <br /> development by a wide expanse of greenspace, berming and/or tree cover. <br /> At both of the neighborhood meetings and the Planning Commission meetings, adjacent property <br /> owners and residents nearby were concerned about whether property values would decrease as a <br /> result of this project. While Staff could find no studies or reports that would indicate such an effect, <br /> two independent appraisers were contacted who stated that it would not be unreasonable to expect a <br /> slight decrease in value, but that would apply only to those properties adjacent to the development. <br /> The overall impact to the neighborhood may not be financial but quality of life or"feel". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.