Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 APPROVED <br /> December 15, 1997 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> Council member Koopmeiners asked why a new roof is necessary when the original inspection of the building <br /> indicated that the roof was in satisfactory condition. <br /> Mr.Olson explained that WAI did an assessment report in April of 1997 and at that time they did a visual <br /> inspection of the roof which indicated that the roof was in relatively good shape-the membrane and flashings <br /> appeared good. The report did note water damage in the interior of the building,but they were not able to <br /> determine when that damage occurred. Mr.Olson noted that during the construction of Phase I,there was <br /> some roof traffic and it was noted that there was a lot of glass on the roof between the rocks. It is possible that <br /> there was damage which occurred during that traffic-however it cannot be proved or disproved. There have <br /> been some leaks in the roof since Phase I was completed. The contractor has looked at repairing some of the <br /> leaking areas,and has repaired some but there still appears to be some leakage.Therefore,the recommendation <br /> was made to replace the roof. <br /> Council member Stigney stated at the last Council meeting,he asked Attorney Long to contact WAI to check <br /> on the contractors insurance to cover the roof problem. This matter will be checked into by Mr.Long. <br /> Mayor McCarty stated he would like to have an options list to look at if the roof is necessary to allow the city to <br /> stay within the project budget. If the roof needs to be done,then the Council should consider dropping some <br /> other items so that they can stay within budget <br /> A discussion followed in regard to whether the roof and sidewalk should be bid out as alternates or as a part of <br /> the entire project bid. Furthermore,it was felt that a list of options totaling the estimated roof and sidewalk <br /> improvements should be put together. Mayor McCarty stated he would like to involve the Community Center <br /> Committee on some of these decisions as well. <br /> Mike Coon,7851 Eastwood Road,asked if a heated sidewalk is really necessary at the Community Center. <br /> Mayor McCarty noted that this is only a suggestion and that no decisions will be made on this until a price has <br /> been obtained on the necessary improvements. <br /> Mr.Olson stated he would need to have some direction from the council in mid-January so that the bid <br /> specifications can,if necessary, reflect the roof replacement and heated sidewalk. <br /> Mr.Olson proceeded to present samples of the proposed brick and color samples of the interior/exterior. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to approve the Design Development Documents for Phase II of the <br /> Community Center. <br /> VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> 6. Consideration of Resolution No.5203,Re-scheduling City Council Meetings Falling on Legal <br /> Holidays. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Stigney to approve Resolution No.5203,Re-scheduling City Council <br /> Meetings Falling on Legal Holidays. <br /> VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> 7. Consideration and Selection of City Council Team Building/Retreat Facilitation and Meeting Date. <br />