My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1998/01/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
Agenda Packets - 1998/01/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:06 PM
Creation date
6/18/2018 5:32:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/26/1998
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/26/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
APPROVED <br /> Page 6 <br /> December 15, 1997 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> Mr.Whiting noted that he had collected information as requested by the Council at their last meeting in regard <br /> to other options for the Council Retreat. He noted that it will be necessary to get input from the Council as to <br /> what they want to achieve at this retreat. <br /> Council member Stigney stated he felt the estimate from Carl Neu was rather high. Many of the things have <br /> already been accomplished-goal settings,mission statements,etc.-and he feels the city should continue where <br /> they left off last year. If the Council sets the agenda,perhaps they could conduct it themselves. <br /> Mr.Whiting stated he feels that last year's session helped get the Council and staff familiar with each other as <br /> individuals and the types of leadership styles of each. The Council should perhaps consider what went well <br /> and what did not go well in 1997 and tailor some type of program towards that. He thinks the difficulty is in <br /> completing the mission statements when facing reality. <br /> Council member Quick felt it would be beneficial to have the same facilitator as the city used last year. <br /> Mayor McCarty stated team building requires an outside interest. He is in favor of utilizing the same facilitator <br /> but would encourage him to be more forceful in terms of team building. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Koopmeiners/Quick to direct staff to approach Mr. Salverda on a team building session <br /> and report back on prices for both one day and 1-1/2 day sessions. <br /> VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> It was recommended that the session should get away from the general presentations and have the council <br /> provide input on what they want covered so that those issues can be addressed. <br /> 8. Staff Briefing on Administration Efforts for Evaluating Assessment Policy Options and Engineering <br /> Policy Option regarding Street Construction Project. <br /> Mr.Whiting noted that he had met with Bruce Kessel and Mike Ulrich in regard to how to outline the various <br /> aspects of a project Additionally,Steve Campbell from SEH was present for input. He noted that Mr.Kessel <br /> is currently working on some of the long-term fiscal implications of various options. Mike Ulrich was able to <br /> evaluate some of the road conditions in the city regarding long-term capital improvements. It is his desire to <br /> get this item on the agenda for further discussion at the January 5th work session. <br /> Council member Stigney asked if the city has ever looked at Assessment Policies of other comparable <br /> municipalities. Mr.Whiting noted that this is something that could be done. <br /> Barbara Haake,3024 County Road I,asked if residents would have the opportunity to give input at the January <br /> 5th meeting. Residents would like to hear all of the facts and information. Perhaps it would be beneficial to <br /> schedule an additional work session to address the residents concerns. Mayor McCarty noted that there are <br /> many issues which will need to be resolved before a decision can be made as to the street improvement project <br /> on County Road I/Spring Lake Road. A discussion followed in regard to the possibility of obtaining a MSA <br /> variance. Ms.Haake noted that the residents really do not want the MSA standards applied to the street. <br /> 9. Consideration of Resolution No.5173,Resolution Approving the Wetland Alteration Permit for <br /> Lots 17 and 18,Edgewood Square,Requested by Good Value Homes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.