Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Ulrich <br /> May 23, 1996 <br /> Page 3 <br /> To aid you in your discussion at the Council meeting this Tuesday, we have prepared a preliminary <br /> list of alternatives that would be discussed in the feasibility study. We would add to this list other <br /> alternatives proposed by City staff or SEH as discussion on the project progress. Preliminary <br /> alternatives to consider include: <br /> 1. Purchase the site and develop the property as a regional detention basin. <br /> 2. Do not purchase the site and use a storm sewer system similar to the one proposed in the <br /> 1977 study (Figure 1). • <br /> 3. Do not purchase the site and construct a trunk storm sewer to Rice Creek as part of the <br /> Highway 10 turnback. <br /> 4. A combination of 2 and 3. <br /> 5. Do not purchase the site and reduce the design standard for storm sewer from a 5-year <br /> to a 2-year. (Would created additional ponding in the streets, but still provides an <br /> adequate drainage system) <br /> • <br /> 6. Do not purchase the site and reduce the storm sewer size requirements and look for other <br /> places for the water to pond(such as the area north of City Hall). <br /> 7. Do not purchase the site and construct a trunk storm sewer system across Highway 10 <br /> and down Edgewood Drive to Rice Creek. <br /> If you have any question,please call me at 490-2026. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. <br /> Rocky J. Keehn, P.E. <br /> Senior Project Engineer <br /> tlo <br /> Enclosures <br /> c: Steve Campbell, SEH <br />