My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-1998 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
05-11-1998 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:55 PM
Creation date
6/18/2018 5:57:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/11/1998
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/11/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UNAPPROVED <br /> Page 13 <br /> April 27, 1998 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> 1 the access as shown is the only one to the restaurant site. Ms.Ash stated her concern that people wanting <br /> 2 to avoid delays at the intersection of Long Lake Road and Highway 10 may choose to cut through the <br /> 3 restaurant site. Mr. Smith stated this is a possibility,however he does not feel people will find that it saves <br /> 4 them any time to use this route. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Julie Olson,2663 Lake Court Circle,asked if the developer has guaranteed in writing that they will <br /> 7 provide a share of the cost for the signalized intersection. Mayor McCarty noted that Resolution 5230 <br /> 8 will require the developer to partake in the cost($187,500). <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Steve Miller,2614 Clearview,stated in attending earlier meetings in regard to the development,it was his <br /> 11 understanding that the developer would assume the cost of any adjustments which needed to be made to get <br /> 12 in and out of that property. Why has the city,since that time,agreed to share in that cost? <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Mayor McCarty noted that with the re-alignment of Edgewood Drive,the city will gain approximately an <br /> 15 additional 2 acres of developable commercial land which is valued at approximately$250,000 plus any <br /> 16 future development tax revenues that are gained. Additionally,it would provide better access to the <br /> 17 community center as well as other benefits to the community. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Mr.Miller asked how long it is anticipated to take to re-coup the$440,000. Mayor McCarty noted that <br /> 20 this information will not be known until such time as the land is developed,however history has shown that <br /> 21 commercial and industrial tax base has been very kind. Mr. Whiting noted that the$442,500 for the <br /> 22 city's portion was a high estimate and may not cost that amount. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Julie Olson,2663 Lake Court Circle asked if Resolution 5230 could be amended to add that there would be <br /> 25 no access to County Road H-2 or Long Lake Road. Mayor McCarty stated he believes this is already in <br /> 26 the recommendation from the Planning Commission and Resolution 5230 merely supports the Council's <br /> 27 position on the signalized intersection. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Mr. Jay Anthony of Anthony Properties explained that full access to the development is critical and it is his <br /> 30 feeling that they can not proceed with merely a right-in/right-out access to the development. The <br /> 31 intersection as proposed will not only benefit the theater,but also the community center and the safety off <br /> 32 of residents at the Edgewood/Highway 10 intersection. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Jerry Linke,2319 Knollwood Drive,stated he is generally in approval of the development but does have <br /> 35 concerns. In reference to the comment that city would gain approximately two acres with the realignment <br /> 36 of the intersection, he noted that this is already city land(park land)and that with the realignment of the <br /> 37 parking lot,the city would actually lose approximately four acres of park land. <br /> 38 Mayor McCarty stated this would be assuming that the city would use the land to the West of the realigned <br /> 39 Edgewood. Furthermore,the area that Mr.Linke refers to as a soccer field is not a regulation soccer field <br /> 40 and there are other fields in the community that are not currently being used. Other concerns expressed <br /> 41 by Mr.Linke included whether the developer has provided a space for recycling of trash and the necessity <br /> 42 of screening the proposed lighting for drivers on Highway 10. He noted that County Road H-2 is a major <br /> 43 arterial and that there should be access to it. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Julie Olson asked if the Council could consider tabling the resolutions until a decision is made in regard to <br /> 46 the proposed signalized intersection. She believes that without a curb cut onto Long Lake Road,MnDOT <br /> 47 will not approve the signal and therefore the project likely cannot proceed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.