Laserfiche WebLink
of the Director of Community Development. Our CD Director Rick Jopke does have economic <br /> 111 development experience and wduld do well in overseeing this position and having it contribute to <br /> community development efforts. Three things to keep in mind however, first, with the lower level <br /> pay will likely come a less experienced individual. That could be overcome with Rick's <br /> experience. Second, the administrative support I currently receive would not be available, <br /> meaning either it is no longer present or it is replaced with someone like an intern. The last intern <br /> with the city was paid $10 an hour with no benefits. And third, this option can mean more <br /> responsibility for the CD Director which may lead to a need to reevaluate his position and pay. <br /> Option 3: Rather than placing the emphasis on economic development, create an assistant city <br /> administrator position whose duties amongst others is to manage economic development work. <br /> One duty that will need to be performed for any of the three options is to staff the needs of the <br /> EDC and EDA. The type of individual that will likely apply for this position will be more of an <br /> administrative type(such as myself). One aspect of this approach would be to create more of a <br /> management team approach to economic development amongst the city administrator, community <br /> development director and assistant. It likely offers the most flexibility in utilizing the skills of any <br /> given applicant, but may be harder to defend in the long run if given hard scrutiny in budgeting. <br /> The salary range could be set anywhere between$35,000 to $60,000, depending on expectations <br /> and commitment to policy objectives. <br /> I think the key thing here for the Council to consider, if something other than what is in place now <br /> were to be looked at, is just what is the desired outcome for the City in working in economic <br /> 0 development. These three options, four if an intern option is considered, reflect policy priorities <br /> more than anything else. My preference is to find the best person available to meet the needs of <br /> the community and Council. <br /> Item 8 -Discussion of 1998 Council Board Appointments: A list of board and commission <br /> openings is enclosed, as well as Council position liaisons. The Council should attempt to assign <br /> the liaisons quickly in order to begin meeting with the respective boards in January. <br /> Item 9 - Cable TV Franchise Agreement Extension: This is the same extension that was done a <br /> couple of months ago. Tom Creighton's letter explains the need to do it again. With Council <br /> permission, I will add to the consent agenda for January 12. <br /> Item 10 - Multi-City Athletic Facility: Back earlier in the fall the mayor, myself and Mary <br /> Saarion were invited to a discussion with the other cities in the school district and the school <br /> district. The meeting outlined the school's need for more athletic facilities and the proposition <br /> was made to have the cities collaborate in finding a site, possibly contributing to facility <br /> construction and participating in joint programming. The logical site is somewhere on the arsenal <br /> property. While I have some concerns about the approach, the City of Arden Bills is offering to <br /> take some type of lead on this with monetary help from the other communities. Rather than <br /> decide whether to contribute now or not (it is not specifically in the budget), my suggestion is to <br /> continue to participate in the joint meetings. A second one will likely come up in January. I am a <br /> 0 little concerned about being swept into something that may require a financial commitment <br /> without consideration being given to the commercial development potential of such a facility. I <br />