Laserfiche WebLink
p Cac �lt <br /> Item No. O <br /> Staff Report No. <br /> Meeting Date: March 2, 1998 <br /> • Type of Business: W.K. <br /> WK: Work Session;PH:Public Hearing; <br /> CA:Consent Agenda:CB:Council Business <br /> City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> From: Michael Ulrich, Director of Public Works <br /> Item Title/Subject: Information regarding Public Hearing on Spring Lake Rd. /Co. I, . <br /> Assessment Policy <br /> Date of Report: - February 26, 1998 <br /> Staff and SEH has prepared a response to the memo forwarded to Councilmembers by Ms. <br /> Haake (see her memo to Council dated 2-9-98). It is attached to this report. In addition to the <br /> responses, staff has prepared a list of items mentioned by either staff, residents or Council that <br /> could be considered with the current street standards and assessment policy. <br /> 1. Should the current assessment policy be revised? yes no <br /> 2. What should be revised? street percentage assessed <br /> storm sewer assessment water main percentage <br /> sanitary sewer main percentage <br /> • <br /> 3.Street assess % 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 <br /> Storm sewer$$ y 400 350 300 250 200 <br /> Water main % 50 45 '( 40 35 30 25 20 <br /> Sanitary main % 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 <br /> 4. Should the City establish a unit price or front foot price to be assessed for all streets <br /> based on the improvement and adjust that amount annually? yes )( no <br /> 5. Should the City appraise each property within a project to establish the individual <br /> property assessment? yes '< no <br /> 6. Should MSA or Co. Turnback funds be applied to the specific roads that receive that <br /> designation, thereby reducing or possibly eliminating any probable <br /> assessments? yes Y no <br /> 7. Should the City standard allow enough width for parking on at least one side of the <br /> street MSA 32', and random parking, 30' on residential streets? ( yes no <br /> 8. Should the current construction standard of a 30 foot wide minimum street <br /> changed? ves ` no <br /> 9. Should the City utilize MSA funding and construction standards where <br /> designated? X yes no <br /> 9. Should the City standard design include curb and gutter? ,4yes no <br /> X B618 D411 <br /> 10. Should the City utilize the existing width of every street and reconstruct to that width, <br /> ie. not widen any streets, not have a standard width. yes )( no <br /> 111 11. Should the City ask residents for street and drainage designs they would prefer for <br /> their street and construct in accordance with the residents requests? yes K no <br />