My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1996/11/04
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
Agenda Packets - 1996/11/04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:53 PM
Creation date
6/18/2018 11:22:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/4/1996
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/4/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council <br /> • Communication between Council and Commissions <br /> October 10, 1996 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Other Ideas for Improving Communication: <br /> 1. We think that it would be advantageous for a Planning Commissioner to be present at <br /> those City Council meetings where the more complicated or controversial planning cases <br /> or variance appeals will be heard, at the discretion of the Planning Commission. The <br /> reasons for this suggestion are similar to those discussed above. Our ability to present the <br /> Commission's basis for our recommendation would assist the Council in your decision <br /> making role, and we would be present to answer questions from City Council about how <br /> we arrived at this recommendation. We have been concerned in the past that applicants <br /> have sometimes misrepresented what happened at the Planning Commission meeting in • <br /> their comments to the City Council. <br /> 2. We agree that an annual or biannual joint meeting of the Planning Commission and City <br /> Council would aid in the communication of goals and objectives. One of these meetings <br /> could include a tour of the city, during which significant development sites could be <br /> viewed as well as the physical results of previous Commission and Council decisions. The <br /> tour may not be necessary every year and could be planned as development dictates. <br /> • It has been the Council's practice in the past to hold a discussion ofoal <br /> g sand issues each <br /> year with the Commissions, and we would urge that this be continued. <br /> 3. We see a lot of potential in the idea of joint meetings between the Planning Commission <br /> and the Economic Development Commission when a project needs to be reviewed by both <br /> bodies. We would like to meet with the EDC to develop this idea further. <br /> 4. We would appreciate receiving the minutes from the EDC as a way to stay informed about <br /> potential development projects. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Jerry Peterson, Chairman <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.