Laserfiche WebLink
interoffice <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> to: Chuck Whiting <br /> from: Dawn Weitzel <br /> subject: Airport Task Force Meeting <br /> date: October 31, 1996 <br /> The Airport Task Force met with MAC representatives on Monday, October 28 in an effort to <br /> resolve issues regarding noise abatement strategies. Those who attended the meeting were: Roy <br /> Fuhrmann, Assistant Manager of Tenant Relations(MAC); Gary Schmidt, Manager of Reliever <br /> Airports(MAC); Jim Nelson, Sue Weber,Duane McCarty, Sue Hankner and Cameron Obent <br /> (residents);Bob Long and Dawn Weitzel. <br /> MAC representatives were first asked about the differences between the 1995 and revised 1996 <br /> Noise Abatement Plan. Fuhrmann stated that there were mainly semantic changes. He then <br /> diagramed a change made in regards to flight patterns, where traffic would be patterning right on <br /> Runway 2-6. He also went on to say that a benefit of the tower is that it gives pilots different <br /> options for flying into the airport, possibly reducing Mounds View overflight. <br /> Sue Weber stated that it is the altitude of the planes that cause problems. MAC representatives <br /> stated that straight and level flight over non-populated areas planes must be at a minimum of 500 <br /> feet, and in populated areas at a minimum of 1,000 feet. This however does not relate to take- <br /> offs and descents where altitude is dependent upon the pilots comfort level. Pilots, in this case, <br /> must fly at the highest reasonable level. It was then clarified that the whole city of Mounds View <br /> is within that take-off and descent area. <br /> Schmidt stated that extension of the east/west runway from 4,000 to 5,000 feet would divert air <br /> traffic patterns from Mounds View. As the north/south runway is 4,850 feet, extension of the <br /> east/west runway may attract larger aircraft. There are no guarantees that Mounds View will <br /> have less aircraft"impact," because winds many times dictate runways used. In order to extend <br /> the runway: MAC's Camp Plan must first be approved; the changes must be incorporated into the <br /> Capital Improvement Plan(will take a year to accomplish); MAC must then determine if funding <br /> is available and if it rates high on a priority level(safety/noise issues). The proposed extension <br /> will not happen for three or four years. <br /> The committee raised the question about tower readings of operations. It was stated that in the <br /> last four weeks, operations(each take-off and landing)averaged 330 per day; the highest count <br /> being 617 operations and lowest being 49. An ILS (Instrumental Landing System)has been <br /> slated to be added to the east/west runway as a safety feature and as an attempt to divert traffic. <br /> This will not mean a reduction of noise, but possibly a reduction of low approaches over <br /> populated areas. <br /> • <br />