Laserfiche WebLink
The cost to provide every residential property with a kit which would include one pair of toilet tank dams, one <br /> low flow aerator, one dye tablet for toilet bowls is $21,115.00. Funds were budgeted, $5,000.00 in the Water <br /> Department, for conservation education and measures in the 1996 budget. Staff is requesting a transfer of funds <br /> from the Water Contingency Fund of$5,000.00 and the remaining $11,115.00 transferred from the Wastewater <br /> Contingency Fund to the Infrastructure fund to pay for the retrofits. Staff will delivery the packets and <br /> information to the residents. (Additional single units will be available should residents request them.) The <br /> anticipated pay back for the retrofits is approximately 8 ''A months. Staff will provide further explanation of the <br /> calculations at the work session. Staff will advertise this program in the local papers and cable TV if Council <br /> approves and authorizes the program. <br /> (;):://, <br /> lichael Ulrich, Director of Public Works <br /> ed„e I //7� f, <br /> ( re. /G rI4 .- ,2lcn <br /> • <br /> The city identifies official controls related to water supply management in the city. City Code, Chapter <br /> 906 addresses the municipal water system. The code gives the city the right to impose regulations <br /> pertaining to conservation of water in an emergency,requires all users to be metered, and sets water <br /> rates. The city follows state building codes as well. The city should consider adopting new ordinances <br /> to promote a more proactive conservation program that includes a permanent odd/even sprinkling ban, an <br /> increasing-or seasonal-block rate structure, or a retrofit program. <br /> The city has no plans for infrastructure expansions in the next five years, thus a capital improvement <br /> program(CIP)is not required. <br /> The city is near fully developed. The current water supply system is sufficient to accommodate future <br /> growth and expansion through 2020. Adoption of the plan is not anticipated to impact the existing <br /> comprehensive plan. <br /> SUMMARY • <br /> Technical comments were prepared by Metropolitan Council staff according to content guidelines and <br /> focus primarily on the conservation part of the plan. The unaccounted-for water loss should be kept to <br /> under 10%. The city needs to report the maximum day and average day demand and keep the maximum <br /> day-to-average day demand ratio to under 3:1. Per capita water use should be reduced or maintained at <br /> current levels. Residential and total water use can be reduced by promoting wise water use through <br /> education, adopting conservation-oriented water rates, and instituting sprinkling bans during peak <br /> demand times. Adequate trigger levels for implementing the emergency preparedness plan and <br /> enforcement procedures are not included in the plan. <br /> The city should forward its water supply plan addendum to the DNR to aid in its review of the Water • <br /> Supply Plan. <br />