My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1996/08/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
Agenda Packets - 1996/08/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:32 PM
Creation date
6/19/2018 6:16:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/12/1996
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/12/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Page 3 <br /> July 15, 1996 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> McDonalds <br /> Burger King <br /> Garbage Haulers-Renewal: <br /> Veit Corporation <br /> Materials Recovery,Ltd. <br /> HVAC-Renewal: <br /> Dependable Indoor Air Quality,Inc. <br /> Peterson&Pinney,Inc. <br /> Sedwick Heating and Air Conditioning <br /> Sharp Heating&Air Conditioning <br /> Suburban Air <br /> West Air,Inc. <br /> Fence-Renewal: <br /> Dakota Fence of Minnesota,Inc. <br /> • MOTION/SECOND: Hankner/Blanchard to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. <br /> VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> RESIDENTS REOUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: <br /> Mayor Linke explained that this portion of the meeting was designated for anyone who wished to speak to <br /> the Council on items that were not on the Agenda. <br /> There were no comments from the floor. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS: <br /> There were no Public Hearings scheduled for this meeting. <br /> COUNCIL BUSINESS: <br /> A. Consideration of Pleasantview Drive Assessment. <br /> Mike Ulrich, Public Works Director, explained that this item was tabled at the June 24, 1996 because there <br /> were some questions in regard to the assessment. He attempted to clarify some of the questions that were <br /> brought up at the June 24th meeting, in regard to the interest,the reasons for the delays in the assessment <br /> of the project, and how many people were involved in the plans and specifications for the project. <br /> Ms. Trude stated she felt the main question was why there was just a one year interest assessment rather <br /> • than over the life of the five year assessment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.