My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1996/07/15
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
Agenda Packets - 1996/07/15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:02 PM
Creation date
6/19/2018 6:35:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/15/1996
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/15/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT FOR ORDINANCE NO. 586 <br /> •07-15-96 <br /> PAGE TWO OF TWO <br /> As per City Council request at the June 10, 1996 City Council meeting, Staff contacted the Fire <br /> Marshall for review and comments on the proposed ordinance. Fire Marshall, Kathryn Gove, has <br /> recommended adopting Chapter 1306.011 Subp. 3 item 8, with a two thousand threshold verses <br /> 5,000 or more gross square feet of floor area or three or more stories in height. This would be <br /> more restrictive than item 8a, initially introduced on June 10, 1996. Fire Prevention Officials <br /> support this ordinance as not only will it protect structures and the community tax base, but also <br /> the lives and jobs of the employees, as well as the lives of the firefighters who volunteer to protect <br /> the structures. <br /> There appears to be some confusion regarding whether planning/building applications processed <br /> prior to the formal adoption and publication of this ordinance will be required to sprinkle existing <br /> or new additions of a building. Fire Marshall Mark Bishop's interpretation is that since this item 8 <br /> provision is not within the Municipal Code now, it appears that the City Council cannot require a <br /> fire suppression system for neither the new nor existing buildings. City Attorney Long has <br /> presented an option that if the City Council does feel strongly about requiring all new buildings to <br /> be sprinkled, that all current planning/building applications may be delayed for 60 days to allow <br /> this ordinance to be approved. Thus, if Council felt it is appropriate for Staff to delay processing <br /> applications for new construction, or expansion of existing buildings that would require sprinkling <br /> under the new ordinance, then after adoption of Ordinance No. 586, would be required to have • <br /> adequate fire suppression systems in place. Staff is requesting City Council guidance relating to <br /> the processing of current building/planning applications that would, under proposed Ordinance <br /> No. 586, require sprinkling. <br /> Fire Chief Zikmund has also enclosed a staff report and will be in attendance at the July 15, 1996 <br /> City Council meeting for any further questions City Council may have regarding fire suppression <br /> system requirements. <br /> S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.