Agenda Packets - 1996/07/15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• MTV VIF REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section STAFF REPORT Report Number: — J WEN Report Date: 7/11/96 S ;_ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE — .1,�Y1 July 15, 1996 — Special Order of Bus. AConsent Agenda ID�Bss•Partntxs , g Public Hearings X Council Business Item Description: Consideration of a request for development review, Herbst& Sons Construction Company Inc., 2299 County Road H, Planning Case No. 445-96. Administrator's Review/Recommendation: -No Comments to supplement this report -Comments attached. Explanation/Summary(attach supplement sheets as necessary) Summary: Herbst& Sons is requesting a development review to construct an 80' x 80' addition(6,400 square feet) to the North of their existing building. The property is currently zoned I-i, Industrial. On July 10, 1996, Herbst& Sons was granted a variance to allow the construction of an addition to an existing facility at a five foot yard setback where a twenty foot setback is required by Municipal Code. In March 1993 Herbst and Sons was granted a variance to the required setback by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. The variance expired one year from the date of issuance, or March 18, 1993. Thus, for this nstruction to take place, it was appropriate for Herbst& Sons to request another variance. Planning mmission Resolution No. 458-96 approving the setback variance is included for your review. o . Regarding the development review, the City Engineering Consultant, SEH, has reviewed this proposal and found that the site expansion should have no negative impacts on the drainage system. This proposal does not require Rice Creek Watershed District approval, as the site is only 1.68 acres in size. The Planning Commission has reviewed this proposal and found that it is in conformance with Title 1100 "Zoning" and Title 1000 "Building Code." The applicant has stated that the expansion is only to be used for storage of equipment, mainly, to get some existing materials stored outside currently inside the building. Thus, it was the Planning Commission's opinion that no additional parking shall be required for the addition. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the development review in Resolution No. 459-96, which is attached for your review. Resolution No. 4969, approving the development request by Herbst & Sons, has been prepared for your review and consideration. All information received for this request has been included for your review. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 784-3055. Acting Community Development Director, Joyce Pruitt 411LCOMMENDATION: Approve/Deny Resolution No. 4969, recommending approval of the development review request by Herbst & Sons, 2299 County Road H, Planning Case No. 445-96.