Laserfiche WebLink
1111111111 <br /> Page 8 <br /> May 13, 1996 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> council could state a condition that the canopy would need to be removed if a new business were <br /> established at that location. <br /> Council member Quick stated he could not support approval of the variance. Trude stated she also would <br /> not be in favor of granting the requested variance. Ms. Blanchard stated the city has a code and their <br /> responsibility is to enforce it,therefore she would not be in favor of granting the variance request as <br /> presented. <br /> responsibility is to enforce it,therefore she would not be in favor of granting the request either as it has <br /> been presented. <br /> It was the general consensus of the council that if Mr.Manke and Mr.Theis go back,redraft the plans and <br /> come back with a new proposal that would not require such a large variance the council would review it <br /> again and make a decision at that time. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Trude to approve Resolution No.4952,A Resolution;Regarding a Variance <br /> Request for Mounds View Fina,2280 West County Road I(denying the variance request). <br /> B. Consideration of Adoption tion of Ordinance No.574,An Ordinance Regulating Adult <br /> P g g <br /> Establishments,Premises Conducive to High Risk Sexual Conduct,Adding Chapters 512 and 608 <br /> and Amending Chapters 1113 and 1116 of the Mounds View Municipal Code. <br /> Ms.Pruitt explained that at the May 6, 1996 Work Session,staff and Bob Long informed the council that <br /> the provision for defming a restaurant as a protected use would not be workable within the proposed Adult <br /> Use Ordinance. Mr.Long stated he felt this restriction could create a problem in defending the ordinance <br /> as constitutional in court. Therefore,the restaurant provision will not be included as a protected use. In <br /> addition,there were a few minor changes which Ms.Pruitt proceeded to go through with the council <br /> members. <br /> Ms. Trude asked about restrictions of signs in the windows of the adult establishment. <br /> Mr.Long stated a court ruling regarding regulations on window coverings could be included as an <br /> amendment to(h)or be added as(i). <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Blanchard to approve the Adoption of Ordinance No. 574,An Ordinance <br /> Regulating Adult Establishments,Premises Conducive to High Risk Sexual Conduct,Adding Chapters 512 <br /> and 608 and Amending Chapters 1113 and 1116 of the Mounds View Municipal Code,WITH THE <br /> AMENDMENT as prepared by Mr.Long incorporating the language permitted as a result of the court <br /> ruling on the window covering regulations,to appear as an amendment to Subd. 6,(h)or added as(i). <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor Linke Aye <br /> Council member Trude Aye <br /> Council member Hankner Aye <br /> Council member Quick Aye <br /> Council member Blanchard Aye <br />