Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 14, 2014 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />Council Member Mueller questioned how existing buildings would be impacted by the proposed 1 <br />overlay district. Planning Associate Heller stated future expansions of existing structures could 2 <br />match existing structures. However, all new buildings would have to comply with the overlay 3 <br />district. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Mayor Flaherty asked for the boundaries of the overlay district. Planning Associate Heller 6 <br />reported the boundaries would span along the County Highway 10 corridor from County Road H 7 <br />to Pleasantview. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Mayor Flaherty inquired how much latitude staff would have in approving complementary 10 <br />building materials. Planning Associate Heller reported all final decisions would remain with the 11 <br />City Council. City Administrator Ericson discussed this matter in further detail and stated new 12 <br />building materials, processes and techniques that meet the intent and purpose of the code could 13 <br />be granted by staff. 14 <br /> 15 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Meehlhause. To Waive the First Reading and Introduce 16 <br />Ordinance 888, Amending Title 1100 by adding Chapter 1128, County Road 10 Overlay District. 17 <br /> 18 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 19 <br /> 20 <br />D. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 889, Revising Chapter 512 of 21 <br />the Mounds View City Code Pertaining to Cigarette and Tobacco Products. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Assistant City Administrator Crane stated that on April 14th the Council approved a Resolution 24 <br />that approved a Tobacco license for Sam’s Market contingent upon several conditions. She read 25 <br />these conditions in full for the record. Staff had concern with the sale of single cigars, known as 26 <br />blunts, at Sam’s Market. For this reason, the Ramsey County Tobacco Coalition and City 27 <br />Attorney recommended City Code pertaining to cigarette and tobacco products be amended. She 28 <br />reported the proposed amendment would eliminate the possible sale of single cigars to minors. 29 <br />Staff reviewed the proposed language within Chapter 512 of City Code and recommended the 30 <br />Council introduce the Ordinance. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Council Member Gunn opposed Item D within the Ordinance. Assistant City Administrator 33 <br />Crane reported this Item has been reworded to read, the licensee must post a sign at the front 34 <br />entrance that prohibits the selling of tobacco and tobacco related products to minors. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Council Member Gunn asked if the City could regulate pricing or if this was mandated by the 37 <br />State. She did not believe that the City wanted to be in the business of regulating tobacco 38 <br />product prices. Assistant City Administrator Crane reported cigars were regulated differently 39 <br />than cigarettes. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Council Member Hull did not agree with the City becoming the pricing agent for cigars. He 42 <br />questioned how the City would gauge moral character. City Administrator Ericson discussed 43 <br />how this issue would be determined by the City and its attorney through the application process. 44 <br /> 45