My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2012/01/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
Agenda Packets - 2012/01/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:45:52 PM
Creation date
6/26/2018 9:17:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/9/2012
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/9/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council December 5, 2011 <br />Truth in Taxation Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />Finance Director Beer then explained the general fund operating expenditures by function. He 1 <br />noted the 2012 budget did not have a lot of increases. He indicated the General Fund operating 2 <br />budget would increase by 1.08%. The 2012 General Fund capital expenditures will decrease by 3 <br />38.06%. The total 2012 General Fund expenditures will decrease by $200,020 or 3.53% below 4 <br />2011. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Finance Director Beer discussed the City’s revenues noting 71% were from general property 7 <br />taxes. He noted the State unallotted $1.1 million in Local Government Aid over the last four 8 <br />years. Even with this loss in State Aid, the property tax levy would remain the same as 2011. 9 <br />Staff then reviewed the tax dollars paid by a median valued home in Mounds View. He then 10 <br />reviewed how the tax dollars were disbursed between the County, City and School District. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Mayor Flaherty noted the estimated tax forms were delivered from the County. He explained 13 <br />that the City pledged to have a 0% increase in the tax levy. However, there would still be a slight 14 <br />increase in taxes due to the changes made at the State level and the loss of market value 15 <br />homestead credits. He indicated that the Council has used fund balances to assist with the 16 <br />budget for 2012. Mayor Flaherty noted the City was spending $200,000 less in 2012 while 17 <br />maintaining the same level of services for its residents. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Paul Sandell, 8457 Pleasant View Drive, indicated he was a long-time resident of Mounds View. 20 <br />He noted he had a 12% increase proposed for 2012 while his neighbors had only a 5% increase. 21 <br />Finance Director Beer stated the difference may be the valuation of his property in comparison to 22 <br />his neighbors. He suggested Mr. Sandell speak further with Ramsey County regarding the 23 <br />valuation prior to March. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned the Council on how to proceed with the hearing. He explained that 26 <br />the Council would be discussing the budget further in a work session at 7:00 p.m. this evening. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Council Member Gunn questioned if there were any changes to the proposed budget since the 29 <br />previous meeting. Finance Director Beer noted the revenues had been increased by $45,000 to 30 <br />reflect the revenues that would be received from Clear Channel for the installation of a dynamic 31 <br />display billboard along 35W. He noted the canine unit was also added to the budget. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Council Member Mueller asked if the $18,000 in building permit revenues budgeted for 2012 34 <br />was accurate and inquired what was received in 2011. Finance Director Beer stated the two 35 <br />senior building projects were still being processed and one should begin in 2012. He indicated 36 <br />the revenues from building permits were placed into the General Fund. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Finance Director Beer reviewed the necessary changes made to the budget due to the GASB 39 <br />Statement 54. He noted the Levy Reduction Fund was included in the General Fund Balance. 40 <br />Staff then discussed items within the budget that would be carried over from 2011 to be 41 <br />completed in 2012. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Mayor Flaherty stated the Levy Reduction Fund was within the General Fund, but would remain 44 <br />separate. Finance Director Beer stated the Council made this clarification through a Resolution 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.