Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 12, 2012 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />several neighbors did not object to the garage itself, the feeling was the rules should have been 1 <br />followed. The Commission could not find the practical difficulty in this case and, therefore, 2 <br />denied the variance request. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Planning Associate Heller stated at this time, the applicant was appealing the variance denial by 5 <br />the Planning Commission. Staff posted another public hearing for this case, and an email was 6 <br />received from the property owners at 2508 Sherwood stating they did not object to the garage. 7 <br />Mayor Flaherty also received a phone call stating a neighbor did not object to the garage. Staff 8 <br />understood that the garage was well built, but found no reason for the variance to be approved. 9 <br />She presented several photos of the garage at 8027 Woodlawn for the Council to review. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Planning Associate Heller requested the Council hold a public hearing, allow the applicant to 12 <br />speak, and then take action on the Resolution. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Mayor Flaherty opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Christy Downing, 8027 Woodlawn Drive, reviewed a written statement with the Council. She 17 <br />requested the Council reconsider the variance request denied by the Planning Commission. Mrs. 18 <br />Downing believed the situation was a big misunderstanding and requested the Council keep their 19 <br />minds open while reviewing the information this evening. She stated the City has been 20 <br />concerned with the height of the garage. It was noted the garage was built according to plans, 21 <br />with the exception of a five inch difference in height and the added dormers. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Mrs. Downing stated the report from the City states the initial plan submitted showed a height of 24 <br />11 feet at the midway point, this was inaccurate. The original plans had a height of 15 feet at the 25 <br />midway point. She reported the City changed their code regarding garage heights, since the 26 <br />original plans were approved. Their garage was being held to the new limit. A change to the 27 <br />trusses brought about the increase in garage height. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Tim Downing, 8027 Woodlawn Drive, stated the garage was constructed between August of 30 <br />2010 and March of 2011. He had received permission from the City to build a garage that had a 31 <br />15 foot mid-way height which resulted in an overall height of 21 feet at the peak. This was 32 <br />changed to 15½ feet at the mid-way point which resulted in an overall height of 22½ feet. He 33 <br />understood he did not have permission to add dormers to the garage. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Mr. Downing stated the staff report claims the garage that was built was different from the plans 36 <br />submitted in 2007. He explained the plans are almost the same, with the exception of the 37 <br />dormers. The original plans were for a single story garage with attic trusses, to allow for storage. 38 <br />The garage that was built was a single story garage with attic trusses with a dormer on each side 39 <br />of the roof. He clarified that the garage was not a two story. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mrs. Downing requested the Council to consider the negative impact the community would feel 42 <br />by denying the variance request. She understood the need for Zoning Codes within the City, 43 <br />however, there was some flexibility built into this system through the variance process. She felt 44 <br />her garage was not causing harm to her neighbors and was in line with the character of the 45