Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 12, 2012 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />neighborhood. Each of her neighbors supported the garage as it was built. She noted the size of 1 <br />the garage was consistent with the design of the house. She felt her lot did have a practical 2 <br />difficulty and should allow for a larger garage due to the larger size of her lot. She requested the 3 <br />Council be flexible and allow for the additional storage space. She noted there were three other 4 <br />homes within 350 feet of her home that had a second garage that was as tall or taller than her 5 <br />garage. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Mrs. Downing stated the garage and its incompletion caused a financial difficulty to her family. 8 <br />The couple has been unable to refinance their home because the project was incomplete. In 9 <br />addition, if the roof and front portion of the garage had to be removed, this would cause yet 10 <br />another financial hardship and delay the completion. This would decrease the aesthetic value of 11 <br />the garage as well. She requested the Council reconsider the request and approve the variance. 12 <br /> 13 <br />John Stacey, 8000 Woodlawn Drive, indicated he assisted Mr. Downing with the trusses on his 14 <br />garage. He did not have any issues with the garage or its height. He felt the house height and 15 <br />garage height were uniform. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Dan Larson, 8046 Woodlawn Drive, stated he did not object to the garage. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Tom Carlson, 8051 Woodlawn Drive, agreed with the comments thus far. He did not object to 20 <br />the garage height. He felt the buildings were similar in character and did not feel the need to 21 <br />make a change in its height. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Mike Reed, 2208 Lois Drive, felt the City Code of 2007 should be followed as that was when the 24 <br />permit was approved. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Hearing no additional public input, Mayor Flaherty closed the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Council Member Mueller requested further information regarding the differences between City 29 <br />Code in 2007 versus 2011. Planning Associate Heller indicated the 15 feet was measured 30 <br />midway between the peak and the eave. However, a steep pitched roof would allow for a taller 31 <br />garage. To simplify this measurement, the overall maximum garage height was changed to 18 32 <br />feet. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Mayor Flaherty indicated the Downings had a great deal of support from their neighbors. He 35 <br />stated the Downings understood they were not prepared for the Planning Commission meeting 36 <br />and asked for the tone of that meeting. Planning Associate Heller stated the Planning 37 <br />Commission did not support the request because it was a variance after the fact. City Code was 38 <br />not followed and changes were made to the plans without being submitted to the City. The vote 39 <br />of the Planning Commission was 6-1. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mayor Flaherty commented the original permit was taken out in 2007. He questioned how long 42 <br />this permit was viable. Planning Associate Heller explained building code allows for the permit 43 <br />to remain in place for six months, so long as work was being done on the site. The Building 44 <br />Official can grant extensions through a written request. She indicated the Downings had 45