My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2012/11/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
Agenda Packets - 2012/11/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:16 PM
Creation date
6/26/2018 3:32:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/26/2012
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/26/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 22, 2012 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1 <br />A. Water Bill Discussion for 6942 Pleasant View Drive. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Finance Director Beer stated this item was discussed at the October 8, 2012 Council meeting. 4 <br />The proposed assessment against this property was in question by the property owner and she 5 <br />requested it be forgiven. The Council requested further information from Staff, which was 6 <br />provided to the Council prior to this meeting. He requested the Council discuss the matter 7 <br />further and provide direction to Staff on how to proceed. 8 <br /> 9 <br />Becky Ness, 6942 Pleasant View Drive, thanked the Council for reviewing this matter further 10 <br />and appreciated Staff for gathering her account information. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Dick Combin, 2832 Woodcrest Drive, asked if the water meter could have been “stuck” based on 13 <br />the deposits in the water. He stated meters were supposed to be checked at three different levels. 14 <br />Finance Director Beer commented if the meter would have “stuck,” the reading would have been 15 <br />lower and not higher. Public Works Director DeBar indicated the City did follow the proper 16 <br />testing procedures. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned when the first letters were sent to Ms. Ness. Ms. Ness indicated the 19 <br />first letter was sent back on April 12, 2004, and that four letters were sent in total. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Mayor Flaherty asked when the City was allowed to replace the reader. Finance Director Beer 22 <br />indicated this work was completed on May 15, 2008. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Mayor Flaherty inquired why it took four years for the work to be completed. Ms. Ness stated 25 <br />her husband did contact the City on two occasions and received no response. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Mayor Flaherty noted the City did try to gain access to the property over a four year period. He 28 <br />stated the average use for this property was 25 units per quarter. If the property had used 29 <br />1,000,000 gallons over the four years, the property would have used 47 units per quarter. He 30 <br />commented the numbers didn’t seem too far off. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Ms. Ness asked if the City could reach a compromise with her applying an average based on her 33 <br />actual use and not the 1,000,000 gallons. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Finance Director Beer commented no interest, late fees or sewer charges were included in this 36 <br />bill. He stated the City has been working with Ms. Ness to resolve this issue. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Ms. Ness indicated she has paid $518 on the outstanding bill and that there was still $900 39 <br />remaining in the balance. She expressed frustration that the City had no proof that the water was 40 <br />used. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Mayor Flaherty explained the City had to decide if 947 units of water ran through her meter. He 43 <br />stated the Council knows that the meter tested positively. He questioned how the Council would 44 <br />like to proceed on this matter. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.