My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2012/11/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
Agenda Packets - 2012/11/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:16 PM
Creation date
6/26/2018 3:32:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/26/2012
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/26/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 22, 2012 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Council Member Stigney was in favor of following the City Attorney’s recommendation. The 2 <br />City Attorney’s comments were reviewed with Ms. Ness. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Council Member Hull stated he did have a toilet that ran constantly and this did increase his 5 <br />water bill dramatically. He commented this could be the case with the Ness family and could 6 <br />account for the water used. He added that the lack of response was also a concern to him. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Council Member Mueller reviewed the water usage for Ms. Ness on a quarterly basis for the 9 <br />years 2000 and 2001. She noted several quarters did have usage over 47 units. She did not feel 10 <br />it was right to ask another resident to cover the expense of this outstanding water bill. She 11 <br />commented the City was generous in not adding late fees or interest. She apologized for the 12 <br />problem with the water meter and wished the issue would have been resolved in a more timely 13 <br />manner. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Ms. Ness did not understand that she was asking her neighbors to cover her water bill. That was 16 <br />not her intention. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Finance Director Beer commented the water meter for Ms. Ness was replaced in 1998. He 19 <br />reported the City received regular readings each quarter from that time until 2004. For this 20 <br />reason, he felt it was highly unlikely that the meter “stuck”. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Council Member Gunn indicated the test results for the meter were clear. She noted the water 23 <br />consumption was clear and she would have to agree with the Council on this matter. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Mayor Flaherty found it difficult to come up with findings of fact with this case. He stated the 26 <br />numbers were not far off and it was apparent that Ms. Ness used more than the estimated 25 units 27 <br />of water per quarter over the four years in question. He had to follow the recommendations of 28 <br />Staff based on the water meter test results and the information presented this evening. He 29 <br />apologized for the situation. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Ms. Ness asked she could work out a payment plan with the City. Finance Director Beer stated 32 <br />the outstanding amount was scheduled to be certified with the County to be assessed against Ms. 33 <br />Ness’ property. In order to reverse this, the Council would need to remove this item from the 34 <br />pending assessment roll. He did not recommend establishing a payment plan as no progress has 35 <br />been made over the past 15 months. 36 <br /> 37 <br />City Administrator Ericson requested the Council make a formal motion on this issue. 38 <br /> 39 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Deny the Request of Resident Becky Ness at 6942 40 <br />Pleasant View Drive for an Adjustment to her Water Bill. 41 <br /> 42 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.