Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 22, 2012 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />B. Resolution 8003, Authorizing a Step Wage Adjustment for Public Services 1 <br />Officer (PSO) Craig Swalchick. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Mayor Flaherty stepped out of the Council chambers at 7:55 p.m. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Assistant City Administrator Crane stated that Public Services Officer Craig Swalchick was a 6 <br />current employee with the City of Mounds View, with the Mounds View Police Department. 7 <br />She explained Officer Swalchick’s supervisor has reviewed his performance and determined he 8 <br />has performed satisfactorily. Staff recommends a step wage adjustment with an effective date of 9 <br />October 26, 2012. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Mayor Flaherty returned to the meeting at 7:57 p.m. 12 <br /> 13 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 8003, 14 <br />Authorizing a Step Wage Adjustment for Public Services Officer (PSO) Craig Swalchick. 15 <br /> 16 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 17 <br /> 18 <br />C. Resolution 8004, Approving the PUD Agreement for the Coventry Senior 19 <br />Living Development. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Planning Associate Heller reviewed the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement for the 22 <br />Coventry Senior Living Development with the Council. She explained the PUD zoning offered 23 <br />greater flexibility for this development. She noted the three parcels within this development 24 <br />were just over two acres in size. Staff recommended approval of the PUD agreement. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Mayor Flaherty requested an update on this development. Planning Associate Heller reported 27 <br />this was a big project and the properties were at the title companies at this time. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Council Member Mueller requested Staff to work with the developer on the placement of a 30 <br />monument sign in front of the building to assure the placement did not obstruct sight lines for 31 <br />traffic. Planning Associate Heller reviewed the potential location of the monument sign with the 32 <br />Council stating it would have to be 15 feet back from County Highway 10. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Council Member Mueller questioned if Ramsey County would be working with the developer on 35 <br />the deceleration lane. City Administrator Ericson stated it would be in the County’s best 36 <br />interests to work with the developer on this issue as the developer would be covering the 37 <br />expense. Planning Associate Heller commented the County has been made aware of this 38 <br />development and the necessary turn lane. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Mayor Flaherty suggested the developer be proactive on this issue and only involve the City if 41 <br />the County was unresponsive. 42 <br /> 43