Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 27, 2011 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />of this building last November. At that time, the Council recommended the Commission move 1 <br />forward with new building plans. He noted the building replacement will be fully funded by 2 <br />Park Dedication funds. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Public Works Director DeBar explained the architectural firm hired in May, TKDA, prepared 5 <br />bidding documents. He noted the park building was brick and mortar design with the picnic 6 <br />pavilion area doubled in size. Staff further reviewed the building layout and design plans with 7 <br />the Council, noting the building would be similar to the Groveland Park building. He then 8 <br />requested the Council approve the bidding documents and authorize advertisement for bids to 9 <br />demolish and reconstruct the Lambert Park building. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Council Member Gunn asked if the building would be handicap accessible. Public Works 12 <br />Director DeBar stated the building would be handicap accessible. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Council Member Stigney did not understand the increased expenses proposed for the park 15 <br />building. Public Works Director DeBar noted the cost estimates were provided by the architect 16 <br />and final expenses would remain unknown until the project was sent out for bid. He further 17 <br />explained how the architect estimated expenses in comparison to the Groveland Park building 18 <br />that was completed by the City in 2006. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Council Member Stigney questioned the life expectancy of the proposed roof for the park 21 <br />building. Public Works Director DeBar stated the upgraded roofing material would last 30-40 22 <br />years. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Council Member Stigney requested information on the roof performance for the buildings at 25 <br />Hillview and Groveland Parks. Public Works Director DeBar stated the Hillview building has 26 <br />had roofing problems and the shingle manufacturer was now out of business. The building was 27 <br />set for replacement in the next year or two. 28 <br /> 29 <br />City Administrator Ericson arrived at 8:20 p.m. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Council Member Stigney requested further information from Staff as to the additional roofing 32 <br />expenses and number of squares on the park building roof. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Council Member Stigney asked if the Park Commission was aware of the increase for the 35 <br />Lambert Park building. Public Works Director DeBar stated the Park Commission had approved 36 <br />of the increased expense. He stated the new buildings were highly utilized and the Park 37 <br />Commission felt the increased amenities would increase the rental of the new facility. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned the balance of the Park Dedication Fund as the City had only 40 <br />budgeted $260,000 for this building. Finance Director Beer stated the fund had approximately 41 <br />$900,000. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Mayor Flaherty stated he would like to see the expense closer to the first projections. He 44 <br />indicated the 30% price increase was a surprise and questioned if it was necessary for the 45