My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2011/10/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
Agenda Packets - 2011/10/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:29 PM
Creation date
6/27/2018 1:42:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/10/2011
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/10/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 12, 2011 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />supporting the Vikings Stadium. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Barbara Haake, 3024 County Road I, thanked the Mayor for his comments this evening. She 3 <br />indicated she was an avid Vikings fan but did not feel the .5% tax increase was fair to Ramsey 4 <br />County tax payers. Ms. Haake expressed frustration that Anoka County and Hennepin County 5 <br />would not be assisting with the tax increase. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Ms. Haake reviewed the proposed plan for the site stating the site would have four entrances and 8 <br />exits which would affect local traffic on game days. In addition, the site would have a great deal 9 <br />of impervious surfaces but this could affect the watershed district or Rice Creek. She 10 <br />recommended the Council add a stipulation that Met Council would be responsible for 11 <br />maintenance and the charges for the lift station and storm sewer needed for this development. In 12 <br />addition, she recommended that if any significant changes were made to the Stadium plans that 13 <br />Mounds View be allowed to withdraw its support. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Mrs. Haake also pointed out two new requirements that should be a part of the resolution: 16 <br />Ms. Haake stated if the stadium and the redevelopment were to contaminate the City’s water 17 <br />supply, it will be the responsibility of the Vikings development. She indicated the water runoff 18 <br />from this site would also have to be treated on the TCAAP site. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Mayor Flaherty thanked Ms. Haake for her input this evening. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Greg Larson, 3377 North Snelling Avenue in Arden Hills, explained he served on the Arden 23 <br />Hills Council for nine years. He spoke in detail on the stadium resolution noting he opposed the 24 <br />development. Mr. Larson also opposed the sales tax levy increase as Ramsey County had a 25 <br />smaller population to cover the great expense. Mr. Larson indicated a referendum bill would be 26 <br />the only fair way for this to proceed to allow the voting public a voice on the issue. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Mr. Larson then reviewed the overall expense that would be assumed by Ramsey County through 29 <br />bond sales, issuance expenses and interest over time. He stated the estimated true expense would 30 <br />be closer to $675 million than $300 million. This burden was too large for Ramsey County and 31 <br />its residents to bare. He suggested the Council not support the sales tax increase for the stadium 32 <br />as now was not the time to increase taxes. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Cindy Palm, 2266 Terrace Drive, clarified that the proposed stadium was an entertainment venue 35 <br />that would be used year round and not just for the Vikings Stadium. She indicated the overall 36 <br />revenue generated from the development would outweigh the increased tax rate. Ms. Palm stated 37 <br />the site needed to be developed and would create jobs for the community. She recommended the 38 <br />Council support the proposed stadium. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Council Member Hull indicated the responses in the letter from Ramsey County were incredibly 41 <br />vague. He questioned if any additional information was available as to how property values 42 <br />would be affected. City Administrator Ericson stated no additional information was available. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Rob Marty, 7627 Spring Lake Road, expressed concern that the airport would be expanded if the 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.