Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2011 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Gunn. To Waive the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance 860, 1 <br />Amending Title 1200 of the Mounds View City Code Relating to the Review and Recordation of 2 <br />Plats and Minor Subdivisions and Plat Dedication Requirements and Amending Appendix E, 3 <br />Minimum Planning and Development Fees and publish the summary report. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Council Member Stigney was pleased that the ambiguity regarding Park Dedication Fees would 6 <br />be clarified through this Ordinance. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Mayor Flaherty agreed stating the plat recording timeline was also extended to assist applicants 9 <br />in meeting the City’s deadline. 10 <br /> 11 <br />ROLL CALL: Hull/Stigney/Mueller/Gunn/Flaherty. 12 <br /> 13 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 14 <br /> 15 <br />B. Resolution 7830, Approving a Layout Configuration for On-Street Parking 16 <br />at Lambert Park. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Public Works Director DeBar explained that Lambert Avenue was part of the Area D Street 19 <br />Improvement Project. Additional parking was needed along Lambert Avenue to serve Lambert 20 <br />Park. Bump-out parking was being proposed along Lambert Avenue and several layout 21 <br />configurations were then presented to the Council. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Public Works Director DeBar stated the Street Committee recommended 60 degree reverse angle 24 <br />parking, which would allow for 19 parking spaces and one handicap space. The Park and Rec 25 <br />Commission were in favor of 60 degree standard parking. Staff noted another option would be 26 <br />90 degree angle parking, which allowed for 22 parking spaces plus one handicap space. This 27 <br />option allowed for the most flexibility for traffic approaching the park. In addition, the public 28 <br />was most familiar with 90 degree parking. Staff noted several members from the Street 29 <br />Committee and Park and Rec Commission were present to take questions from the Council. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Council Member Mueller questioned why only one handicap space was recommended adjacent 32 <br />to the park. Public Works Director DeBar explained one handicap space was required according 33 <br />to ADA requirements. An additional handicap space would be needed if there were over 25 34 <br />parking spaces adjacent to the park. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Council Member Hull asked the benefit of the reverse angle parking and questioned if the City 37 <br />would be changing all of its on-street parking to this style. Public Works Director DeBar stated 38 <br />it could be confusing if the reverse angle parking was used only at Lambert Park. He indicated 39 <br />an overall parking change would have to be determined by the Council. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Council Member Gunn was in favor of the 90 degree parking layout configuration as this allowed 42 <br />for the most parking spaces. She indicated it allowed cars to pull into the spaces from both 43 <br />approaching lanes of traffic. In addition, residents could also back into the spaces. 44 <br /> 45