My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2011/10/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
Agenda Packets - 2011/10/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:40 PM
Creation date
6/27/2018 1:44:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/24/2011
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/24/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2011 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />Mayor Flaherty thanked the Commission and Committees for their recommendations to Council. 1 <br />He felt the 60 degree reverse angle parking would limit the approach of traffic to the parking 2 <br />spaces. 3 <br /> 4 <br />John Kroeger, a member of the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Commission, explained the Park 5 <br />and Rec Commission walked through the park in May of this year. The Commission felt the 6 <br />parking should be condensed to a smaller area with the 60 degree angle. He was not an engineer 7 <br />and felt the final call should be made by City staff. Either way, the neighborhood would 8 <br />appreciate the parking be placed in one area and not spread along the entire park. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Brian Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, indicated the 60 degree reverse angle parking was 11 <br />recommended for safety reasons. It also allowed for the area to be more bicycle friendly. He 12 <br />indicated backing out of the 90 degree spaces could be dangerous as traffic would be approaching 13 <br />from both directions. The 60 degree reverse angle parking allowed the driver to see traffic 14 <br />approaching from just the one side and increased overall safety. He encouraged the Council to 15 <br />proceed with the standard 60 degree angle parking if the reverse angle was not favored. This 16 <br />would keep the parking consistent with Hillview Park. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Cindy Palm, a member of the Parks, Recreation, and Forestry Commission, stated backing into 19 <br />parking spaces was dangerous, especially when children were present. 20 <br /> 21 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Gunn. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7830, 22 <br />Approving a Layout Configuration for On-Street Parking with 90 Degree Parking at Lambert 23 <br />Park. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Council Member Hull was in favor of the reverse angle parking as this did increase safety. 26 <br />However, with no long term parking plan in the City, he would support the 90 degree angle 27 <br />parking. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Council Member Mueller typically supported angled parking, but felt the 90 degree parking 30 <br />would service the park best. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Mayor Flaherty stated the 90 degree parking would ensure that people did not have to complete a 33 <br />u-turn to enter a parking stall. He felt the neighboring homeowners would appreciate this 34 <br />configuration. However, the 60 degree angled parking did offer the most safety. 35 <br /> 36 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1 (Flaherty) Motion carried. 37 <br /> 38 <br />C. Resolution 7829, Authorizing Step Increases for Police Officer Andrew 39 <br />Olson, Accountant Agnes Quasabart, and Public Service Officer Craig 40 <br />Swalchick. 41 <br /> 42 <br />City Administrator Ericson stated Staff was recommending step increases for Police Officer 43 <br />Andrew Olson, Accountant Agnes Quasabart and Public Service Officer Craig Swalchick. Staff 44 <br />read Resolution 7829 in full to the Council and recommended approval. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.