Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2011 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> <br />Public Works Director DeBar reviewed the fee proposals described in the Staff report and 1 <br />recommended the Council authorize Stantec Consulting Services Inc. to perform engineering 2 <br />design services for Area, as their bid was lowest. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Brian Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, commented that the Street and Utility Committee was 5 <br />not aware of the information presented by Staff this evening and had not reviewed Staff’s 6 <br />recommendation. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Mayor Flaherty asked Public Works Director DeBar if the Street and Utilities Committee 9 <br />reviewed the engineering fees in the past. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Public Works Director DeBar indicated that the Committee has reviewed the overall Program 12 <br />costs that include the engineering fees, but the Committee has never reviewed engineering fees 13 <br />individually. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned why Stantec’s figures were $258,000 less than the original estimation. 16 <br />Lee Mann, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. stated the original fee schedule was created by an 17 <br />individual that was no longer with the firm. For this reason, the new numbers were reviewed 18 <br />with Public Works Director DeBar and the new estimation streamlined several processes, 19 <br />creating greater efficiencies, reducing the expense to the City. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Public Works Director DeBar added that after completing several street improvement projects for 22 <br />the City, the City was seeing some efficiencies in the process, which was reducing the overall 23 <br />expense of the project. Public Works Director DeBar was not comfortable with Bonestroo’s 24 <br />preliminary fee estimate and was confident that the fee estimate could be reduced. Public Works 25 <br />Director DeBar also credited the lower fee to City Staff talking on a larger portion of the 26 <br />workload through each improvement project, which reduced the time spend by the engineering 27 <br />consultant. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Mayor Flaherty asked when the Street and Utilities Committee would be typically informed of 30 <br />the information presented by Staff this evening. Public Works Director DeBar indicated he 31 <br />spoke with the Council earlier this year about continuing to use Bonestroo for Area E or allowing 32 <br />other firms to submit fee proposals, at which time the Council directed Staff to proceed with 33 <br />using Bonestroo. However, with the unique situation of a merger, Staff felt this was an 34 <br />opportune time to review the situation and allow fee proposals to be solicited by two firms with 35 <br />staff having experience with the City’s street projects. In the end, the solicitation was good for 36 <br />the residents, and taxpayers would win through the cost savings. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Mayor Flaherty asked Public Works Director DeBar whether the engineering costs associated 39 <br />with last year’s Area D project were brought to the Street Committee for their review. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Public Works Director DeBar reported they were not. 42 <br /> 43