Agenda Packets - 2011/11/14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council October 24, 2011 Regular Meeting Page 4 1 Council Member Stigney felt the City was right in this matter and should have the case presented 2 to a judge. 3 4 Ayes – 3 Nays – 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. 5 6 B. Resolution 7843, Approving the Minor Subdivision of 7337 Spring Lake 7 Road. 8 9 Associate Planner Heller explained the Council was being asked to consider a minor subdivision 10 at 7337 Spring Lake Road. The original owners lived at this address since 1948. Both have 11 since passed and the children were preparing the home for sale. The home was situated on the 12 property in such a manner to allow for a subdivision of the parcel into two lots. The south lot 13 would be vacant and could have a new house built on the site. The size and setbacks of the lot 14 meet City Code. 15 16 Associate Planner Heller indicated park dedication fees were recommended for the square 17 footage of the new lot. Staff sent notices to adjacent property owners prior to the Planning 18 Commission and no comments were received. The Planning Commission unanimously 19 recommended approval of the minor subdivision. 20 21 Mayor Flaherty questioned if the Planning Commission recommended the 5% park dedication 22 fee. Associate Planner Heller stated the amount was included within the Staff report, but this 23 amount was not determined by the Planning Commission. 24 25 MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7843, 26 Approving the Minor Subdivision of 7337 Spring Lake Road. 27 28 Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 29 30 C. Resolution 7841, Authorizing the Abatement of Nuisance Code Violations at 31 2242 Bronson Drive. 32 33 City Administrator Ericson indicated this Resolution would seek authorization to conduct an 34 abatement at 2242 Bronson Drive. The neighboring property owner was present at the October 35 work session meeting to discuss the concerns at 2242 Bronson Drive. The City’s code 36 enforcement officer has been to the property on a number of occasions and the property owner 37 was working to correct the violations. 38 39 City Administrator Ericson handed out an updated progress report on the property. He 40 recommended the Council authorize the abatement to ensure that the remaining items are 41 handled. If approved, the City would abate the nuisance items no sooner than five calendar days 42 from today’s date. This would provide the property owner several additional days to correct the 43 violations before the City would take action. Those expenses would then be assessed to the 44 property owner. 45