My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/02/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/02/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:34 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 9:05:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/24/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/24/1997
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Non-Benefits <br /> Does not get rid of the existing hole for the pond. <br /> • Will have short term ponding during rainfall events <br /> Option 4. New Pipes - Surge Manhole <br /> Remove existing storm sewer and raise the storm sewer which eliminates the need for sump <br /> manholes. <br /> Excavate the existing pond to native material. <br /> Fill the pond with granular material to elevation 906.0 (elevation of the existing water in the <br /> pond) <br /> Connect sump manholes to surge and rate control manhole next to highway ditch <br /> This eliminates standing water by raising the storm sewers so the discharge elevation is above the <br /> invert of the outlet pipe in the highway ditch(904.58). However,it does not eliminate the <br /> detention function of the area;therefore,the existing"hole" would remain. This option allows the <br /> pond to be filled an additional 1.5 to 2 feet. This puts the bottom of the pond around elevation <br /> 906.0 which is near existing normal water elevations. The sump manhole would control the water <br /> that gets into the highway drainage system. If water cannot flow through the small 6-inch orifice <br /> opening, it would surge out of the manhole and into the detention area. For the most part the water <br /> quality function of the pond would be lost which may require a new pond offsite. Only difference <br /> between this option and option 2 is the sump manholes are eliminated. <br /> • Project Cost. $95,500 <br /> Benefit(s): <br /> No annual sump maintenance <br /> Pond Bottom is near existing normal water elevation. <br /> Non-Benefits <br /> Does not get rid of the existing hole for the pond. <br /> Will have short term ponding during rainfall events <br /> Option 5. Bury storage including retention storage. <br /> Create sump catch basins at each inlet to the pond which drain to the pond. <br /> Excavate the existing pond to native material. <br /> Replace the lost pond volume using large CMP culverts which allows the pond to be - <br /> completely filled. - <br /> With this option the existing ponding is eliminated by using Corrugated Metal Culverts (CMP). <br /> Enough CMP's are buried in the pond location to compensate for the lost storage. This will allow <br /> the site to be filled to near the elevation of the existing land. Sump catch basins are installed prior <br /> to discharging into the underground CMP system to collect a portion of the sediment. Some of the <br /> CMP should be perforated to take advantage of the natural infiltration of the soils. For the most <br /> part the water quality function of the pond would be lost. However, with proper maintenance of the <br /> sump catch basins, an additional water quality pond should not be required. <br /> • Project Cost. $165,000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.