My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/03/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/03/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:44 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 9:15:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/3/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/3/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Golf Course Management <br /> By Contract <br /> • <br /> "How can they raise the green fees for a course in such poor condition?" <br /> "I have never seen any maintenance personnel working out here." <br /> "The city has no business operating the golf course." <br /> These are just some of the comments made by golfers today reflecting the state of many public <br /> golf courses. While a great majority of our public courses are fine facilities and provide a golfing <br /> experience worthy of their green fee, there are some courses,which for a number of reasons <br /> such as budget restraints,labor costs, or poor management,cannot and should not justify the <br /> price charged to play a round of golf. <br /> For many golf course owners and operators,and especially those of municipally-owned courses, <br /> the idea of leasing their course to a management firm which may have more expertise in <br /> operating a golf facility has been accepted in some locales with great relief. <br /> This report will examine golf course management and the trend to lease and contract out the <br /> responsibilities of managing golf courses. While many types of courses,both public and private, <br /> are operated by management firms,the concentration is on the municipal golf course. That is, <br /> a course which is under the control of a tax-supported agency such as a city,county,or species <br /> district providing recreation and park services.. Its primary goal is to provide a recreation <br /> facility for the greatest number of citizens at the most reasonable cost to the taxpayers. <br /> 1 <br /> HISTORY <br /> To begin with,how did the idea of contracting golf operations get started? Quite simply,it was <br /> and is a matter of dollars and cents. It is expensive to operate and maintain a golf course at a <br /> level that is satisfactory to the golfing public. Increasing expenses over the years have made it <br /> difficult for many municipalities to operate their courses without dipping into the city coffers <br /> and relying on an annual subsidy. <br /> Rising labor costs have been significant in the trend toward private management. National <br /> Golf Foundation studies found that the average maintenance costs for regulation 18-hole <br /> municipal course were S250,000 or more annually with ranges from $50,000 to as much as <br /> $700,000. Many muni courses are staffed with union labor which, generally, costs more than <br /> labor which might be used by a management company. <br /> Private management was further encouraged in the late 1970s when taxpayer revolts,led by the <br /> Jarvis-Gann Amendment in California, otherwise known as Proposition 13, dramatically cut <br /> the budgets in all levels of government. Recreation and park services in general, and gol <br /> courses directly,were hit hard by these so-called reforms. Budgets were cut and the philosop <br /> of"pay-as-you-go"was irtituted. This put pressure on city hall, and in many areas,subsidies <br /> to the golf courses were emphatically reduced if not ended. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.