Agenda Packets - 1997/03/24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Resolution No. 5098 (Option#3) Planning Case No. 473-97, Oversized Garage CUP March 24, 1997 • Page 2 2. The Geographical Area Involved. • 4. The Character of the Surrounding Area The lots in this area are either the same size as the subject lot or are smaller. The homes in this area are of a similar style and construction, with detached or attached garages. Since 2185 Pinewood is a corner lot and also fronts County Road I, it has more visibility than the other homes in this area. The proposed garage is significantly larger than what is typical for this area. In relation to the principal residence, the garage would be almost twice as large. A smaller garage would be a better fit on this site than would the garage proposed by the applicant. 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed Removing the existing, one car garage and replacing it with a new, larger garage would create a trade-off. There would be a benefit to the area in the sense that it is an upgrade to an existing building, and an improvement to the property. The negative aspect relates back to the size--neighbors in the area have stated that the size of the proposed garage is simply too out of proposrtion with the house and the neighboring homes. 1111 5. The Demonstrated Need for Such a Use. The applicant has stated that this garage is needed to store vehicles used for racing, a hobby the residents partake in. Previously, the applicant was asked by the City to remove a large car carrier from their rear yard. Currently, the car carrier is in the front driveway because the existing garage is too small. A new, larger garage would enable the applicant to keep the car carrier and race cars inside, as well as other yard appliances. Measurements taken by staff, however, reveal that a 24 foot by 36 foot garage would also provide adequate space needs. A garage of this size--864 square feet—would not require a conditional use permit as it is the maximum size allowed without triggering a CUP. • WHEREAS, the City Council makes the following findings regarding the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 3.b.: (1) The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. (7) The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. (8) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be provided. The construction of an oversized garage to replace an existing garage would not create a • greater impact on existing public facilities or services, on utilities or access roads, nor will it create an appreciable increase in traffic on adjacent streets. The increase in runoff from the