Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. 5098 (Option#3) <br /> Planning Case No. 473-97, Oversized Garage CUP <br /> March 24, 1997 <br /> Page 3 <br /> larger structure is not significant and will not affect the drainage system. <br /> (2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent <br /> residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and <br /> there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. <br /> (3) The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon <br /> adjacent residential properties. <br /> The proposed garage is expected to stand out in sharp contrast to the surrounding homes <br /> and garages. The character of this area is one of small homes, small garages on small lots. <br /> The City has received complaints from neighboring property owners objecting to this <br /> project. A smaller garage, perhaps 24 x 36 feet, would be more readily acceptable to <br /> neighbors. <br /> (4) The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the <br /> City and to the existing land use. <br /> (5) The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code and the purposes of the zoning <br /> district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. <br /> (6) The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> • <br /> Garages are permitted accessory uses in residential areas and allow for the indoor, sheltered <br /> storage of vehicles and other equipment. A larger garage would allow the property owner <br /> to keep more yard equipment and other things stored inside which would reduce exterior <br /> clutter. A garage of this size, however, in this neighborhood would seem to c t lictt with <br /> the Comp Plan relating to compatibility with the surrounding area. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council <br /> recommends denial of the conditional use permit based upon the following findings of fact: <br /> 1. The proposed garage would be almost twice the size of the principal structure.. <br /> 2. The applicant's car hauler can fit into a garage with a 36-foot depth. <br /> 3. The adjacent and neighboring property owners are opposed to the project. <br /> 4. A standard width for a two-car garage is 24 feet. <br /> 5. The garage would not be compatible with surrounding homes and garages. <br /> 6. The garage would not be adequately screened or separated from adjacent properties. • <br />