Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Case No.477-97 <br /> D.W. Jones PUD Project <br /> April28, 1997 • <br /> Page 8 <br /> whether they are placed to work with the topography of the site. Staff has included a requirement <br /> that a detailed drainage analysis be submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Engineer <br /> before the development stage plan is approved. <br /> Natural Features and Open Space: This proposed development would replace what is now <br /> vacant land with commercial and residential uses, preserving the wetland that is present on this <br /> site. The wetland itself will not be altered in any way as a result of this project, although the <br /> applicant has indicated a willingness to remove debris and deepen the wetland Wit would improve <br /> its ecology. Much of the site is covered in prairie-type grasses and scrub trees, although there are <br /> a number of significant trees as well. The developer has incorporated many of the significant trees <br /> into the design and landscaping of the project. Staff has included a requirement that a walking <br /> path around the wetland be evaluated when the development plan is submitted, and be built by the <br /> developer if required by the City, in addition to the boardwalk and overlook proposed by the <br /> applicants. The SRF study indicated that a pedestrian way around the wetland and over the St. <br /> Paul Waterworks would be desirable. <br /> Encroachment into the Wetland Buffer: Both the Planning Commission and Staff are concerned <br /> with the degree to which the senior building and the office building at the east end of the site <br /> encroach into the wetland buffer. The applicant has calculated that 45% of the buffer area is <br /> proposed to be in impervious coverage(either building or paving). Staff contacted surrounding <br /> communities to determine how other cities regulate wetland buffers and to what extent. Of the • <br /> eleven cities contacted, only two (Maplewood and Blaine) had a wetland buffer ordinance; the <br /> other nine did not. Maplewood's buffer requirements range between 10 and 100 feet depending <br /> upon the type and class of water involved. Blaine's buffer is 100 feet. The following cities had no <br /> buffering requirement: New Brighton, Spring Lake Park, Fridley, Coon Rapids, Shoreview, Arden <br /> Hills, Little Canada, White Bear Lake and Vadnais Heights. <br /> Park Dedication Requirements: The applicant will need to provide a park dedication payment in <br /> an amount required by the City's subdivision ordinance as a condition of this PUD. The fee for <br /> the residential component is 10 percent of the land value given the ratio of 10.3 residential units <br /> per acre, less the wetland acreage. The fee for the commercial and office uses are also based upon <br /> 10 percent of the land value. The applicants have indicated a willingness to satisfy this <br /> requirement. <br /> Provision for Common Open Space: The site plan does not designate any specific area for <br /> common open space. The Zoning Code establishes criteria for PUD approval, one of which is that <br /> a sufficient amount of"usable" open space is provided. The Zoning Code does not include <br /> standards as to what is considered sufficient. In addition, the Zoning Code requires 625 square <br /> feet of usable open space be provided for each multiple family residential unit. (This requirement <br /> could be modified through the PUD, and some modification may be warranted since residents of <br /> the building will be senior citizens rather than families, and there is an extensive visual open space <br /> by virtue of the wetland on the property.) The usual requirement for the 83-unit apartment • <br /> building would be 1.2 acres of useable open space. The site plan dated 4-22-97 shows <br /> approximately 30 feet of open space in the form of the wetland buffer behind the senior complex <br />