05-12-1997 CC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

UNAPPBO'VLI Page 6 • April 28, 1997 Mounds View City Council 1 Mayor McCarty reminded residents that the Planned Unit Development is a cooperative effort and that the city 2 cannot demand anything,it is merely a negotiation process. He suggested that Options#1 and#2 be combined, 3 striking the first sentence in Option#2,and including the remainder of Option#2,thereby approving the first 4 reading of the ordinance and scheduling the second reading when every one is ready. He stated he would like 5 to formalize the"laundry list" and incorporate it under a second motion indicating that all of this is to be 6 supplied by the applicant by May 16, 1997. 7 8 Council member Stigney felt by approving the Resolution,the council would be approving the general concept 9 of the plan. He has some concerns in doing this. 10 11 Mr.Long noted that if the council is not satisfied with the developer's response to the issues by the second 12 reading,the council would have the discretion to not approve the ordinance. This would not lock the council 13 in to approving the project. It would only give indication that the council wants them to proceed to the second 14 stage. 15 16 Council member Stigney stated he would favor Option#3. 17 18 Council member Trude wondered if this was too intense of a development for the site to avoid run-off parking. 19 Ms. Sheldon noted that after the additional information is obtained,the layout may need to be adjusted 20 downward. The Council could note that they would like to see a revised site layout that reflects this • 21 information and adjustment to the density if needed as insurance. 22 23 Council member Trude asked if the State Highway Department would give three access points. Ms. Sheldon 24 stated she talked with Bill Keen who saw the proposed plan as an improvement to the existing situation. Ms. 25 Trude stated she would like to keep a very close eye on the traffic flow for the development because she feels 26 this is a very important issue. 27 28 MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Koopmeiners to Approve the Introduction of Ordinance No. 599,an 29 Ordinance Approving a Rezoning from B-2 to Planned Unit Development(PUD)for commercial uses for 30 property located southeast of the Highway 10/Silver Lake Road intersection. 31 32 ROLL CALL VOTE: 33 34 Mayor McCarty aye 35 Council member Trude aye 3 6 Council member Koopmeiners aye 37 Council member Stigney nay 38 Council member Quick nay 39 40 Motion Carried(3-2) 41 42 MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Trude that the requirements of Options#1 and#2 be combined for further 43 study and that these be accomplished before the second reading,that a traffic study be conducted and that 44 review of the applicant's submittal be completed by a design consultant. 45 46 Council member Stigney stated he feels perhaps the city is overlooking the U of M Study on the Highway 10 1111 47 Corridor. He feels that the city should wait to see what they recommend before proceeding with the project. 48 He has concerns about another car wash/gas station/fast food right across the street from another.