Laserfiche WebLink
Page 7 <br /> • April 28, 1997 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> 1 Mayor McCarty stated he has a copies of the Section 9 Study,the Comprehensive Plan and the Highway 10 <br /> 2 study. These are the city's dreams,however,his intentions as well as the others in the city,in terms of what <br /> 3 they want the community to be,must be weighted with the full knowledge of their constitutional rights in the <br /> 4 hands of property owners. The city cannot tell property owners what they are going to put on their property, <br /> 5 and they can only negotiate through the PUD process. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 MOTION by Stigney to amend the previous motion that the results of the Highway 10 U of MN Corridor Study <br /> 8 be addressed prior to the second reading of Ordinance No. 599. MOTION FAILS FOR LACK OF SECOND. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Joanne Meyers,Silver Lake Wood Townhomes,stated she had concerns with traffic problems which may occur <br /> 11 with those who are attempting to make a left hand turn off of Highway 10 to the gas station during rush hour <br /> 12 traffic. She also is concerned about the wetlands. She felt a lot of drainage off the area would affect the <br /> 13 wetland. She wondered if zoning change could change the type of traffic in the area. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Dan Moon,6929 Pleasant View Drive,asked why Senior Citizen housing was being proposed when there is a <br /> 16 large senior complex being constructed on Highway 10 in Spring Lake Park. Mayor McCarty noted that there <br /> 17 is a high demand for that type of housing in the area. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 John Adair of Faegre&Benson,stated he is somewhat concerned about the 120 day limitation. He feels the <br /> 20 city should proceed with a second reading and count on the Exhibit 1 as addressing all of the concerns which <br /> 21 must be satisfied before the development stage is approved. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Mayor McCarty stated noted that the Ordinance cannot even be enforced until 60 days have passed under the <br /> 24 Charter requirements. He views the motion as a double check to see that those concerns are indeed <br /> 25 addressed. He also is concerned about the 120 day time limit. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Attorney Long noted that what the Council is being asked to do is an alternative method of considering <br /> 28 rezoning. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> 31 <br /> 32 PUBLIC HEARINGS-continued: <br /> 33 <br /> 34 First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance No.600,to Consider Amending the Assessment Policy. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 9:15 p.m. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Mike Ulrich,Public Works Director,explained that at the April 7, 1997 City Council Work Session,several <br /> 39 revisions were recommended to the assessment policy. He noted that the primary revisions are for the storm <br /> 40 sewer assessment and one revision to the assessment for corner industrial and commercial property. He noted <br /> 41 that copies of the excerpts of the assessment policy were included in the agenda packets. He proceeded to go <br /> 42 through the changes. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Gregg Lien,Midway Industrial Supply,stated they would be dramatically affected by the Ordinance as it now <br /> 45 stands,as they have frontage on Mustang. They do not rely on traffic coming off Mustang,therefore <br /> 46 the frontage would be of no benefit to them. He urged the Council to consider the new amended ordinance. <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 9:24 p.m. <br />