Laserfiche WebLink
City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> May 9, 1997 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 1111 <br /> other is in the seven mile radius. The 14-screen theater in White Bear Township is not on the <br /> map because it is outside the seven mile radius. The map shows that Mounds View is in the <br /> center of a substantial area that is not served by movie theaters, with more population growth <br /> occurring to the north, northeast and northwest. <br /> A question has been raised whether 16 screens are needed. Recent articles have indicated that <br /> these"big box"theaters are the new trend, and smaller theaters will no longer be built. Also <br /> the"big box"theaters may cause the smaller ones to close because they will not no longer be <br /> competitive. It is interesting to note that on the map showing existing theaters,they are <br /> clustered in twos where the total screens for both theaters is the same as the big box theater. <br /> This trend may represent consolidation of who owns the screens and not a new level of how <br /> many are clustered together. <br /> A question was also raised whether the theater portion was consistent or inconsistent with the <br /> Feasibility/Highest and Best Use Analysis prepared by Towle Real Estate as part of the <br /> Highway 10-Area 9 Study, which was commissioned by the City. We have received a letter <br /> from Rodger L. Skare, MAI, who prepared the Towle Report clarifying that they see one multi- <br /> screen movie complex as feasible in the Mounds View-Northtown area. There is no active <br /> proposal for a multi-screen theater at Northtown at this time. <br /> Residents in the adjacent neighborhood have expressed concerns over what will happen if the <br /> theater fails and the building is left vacant. A condition has been included in the PUD <br /> . stipulations that the theater site must be cleared if the building is left vacant for 24 months, and <br /> that the property must be maintained during the interim period. A article regarding Carmike <br /> Cinema, Inc. which appeared in Bottom Line magazine indicates high earnings and healthy <br /> growth for this company. <br /> #2: Analysis of General Concept Plan <br /> The three reports prepared for the Planning Commission contained detailed discussions of issues raised <br /> by residents in the discussion of this project. What follows is a summary of this information. <br /> • Wetland and Wetland Buffer <br /> The site contains a Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR)protected wetland of <br /> approximately 8.5 acres. A wetland delineation study was done in September, 1996. No construction <br /> work is proposed in the wetland. Comments received from DNR state that if no work is done in the <br /> wetland,the proposed development will conform to this agency's requirements. A permit from Rice <br /> Creek Watershed District will be required. The proposal shows the necessary water quality ponds used <br /> to filter runoff before it enters the wetland. Wayne Jacobson, a wetland expert in the City Engineer's <br /> Office, has stated that the higher water levels in the wetland will improve its ecology, with the <br /> exceptionof floral diversity and integrity. Higher water elevations will tend to support more cattail <br /> growth and less reed canary grass and willow edge, until this type of vegetation is re-established along <br /> the new water edge. <br /> The City of Mounds View has an adopted a wetland zoning district which establishes a 100-foot buffer <br /> S <br /> area abutting identified wetlands. Grading and construction in the buffer area requires approval of a <br /> wetland alteration permit. These permits may be granted as long as certain criteria were met, drainage <br /> controlled and the adjacent wetland was protected from degradation. The applicant is proposing to <br /> build a portion of the theater building and both detention ponds in the wetland buffer. Detention ponds <br />