My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/05/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/05/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:56 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 2:40:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/12/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/12/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br /> Case No.471-97: O'Neil Property <br /> March 28, 1997 <br /> Page 5 <br /> are typically placed in the buffer area since they need to be close to the wetland. They usually <br /> revegetate so they continue to provide a"natural"buffer for the wetland. Encroachment of buildings <br /> into buffer areas creates less problems than parking lots because the runoff is cleaner. Staff regards the <br /> encroachment of the theater building into the buffer as workable if the area between the building and <br /> the wetland is left natural, so the vegetation will continue to provide a filtering and screening effect. A <br /> portion of the restaurant development on Parcels A&B may be in the buffer, although the amount will <br /> not be known until we have a specific layout with the development stage plan. <br /> ■ Drainage <br /> The proposed drainage system is consistent with the City's local water management plan, and will <br /> provide the necessary water quality filtering before runoff enters the wetland. Increased flows into the <br /> wetland will increase water surface elevations by 0.2 feet in a 10 year storm, and 0.3 feet in a 100 year <br /> storm. The increased water elevation will not have a negative impact on adjacent structures or roads; <br /> the water will remain on the site. The City Engineer recommends that the existing 15" pipe from the <br /> wetland into the Long Lake Road storm sewer remain as is, since enlarging it would cause capacity <br /> problems downstream and there is enough room to store water in the wetland. There should not be any <br /> impacts to existing groundwater table, and little change in the current recharge potential of the area. <br /> An engineered drainage design would be submitted at the development plan stage. <br /> Residents south of the O'Neil property have expressed concerns that this development will increase <br /> existing problems with flooding in their backyards. The City Engineer reviewed this situation and <br /> responded that the localized flooding south of County Road H2 is not affected by the O'Neil property, <br /> even with development. Also, according to Al Sunderman, a groundwater specialist in the City <br /> Engineer's Office,there should not be any impacts to the existing groundwater table in the area. It is the <br /> City Engineer's view that flooding in the neighborhood is being caused by upstream drainage from the <br /> north side of Highway 10 overloading the existing storm drain system in the neighborhood. The size of <br /> the storm drains needs to be upgraded or a parallel line installed so water is diverted before it reaches <br /> the storm drain in County Road H2. <br /> • Soils <br /> The soils on the O'Neil property are classified as having moderate limitations, in the area proposed for <br /> development, and severe limitations where the wetland is located. According to the plan, "most <br /> development can occur without complex erosion or slope problems"in this category. Staff <br /> recommends that soil testing be done at the development plan stage only if determined necessary by the <br /> City Engineer. <br /> • Vegetation &Landscaping <br /> The applicant is proposing to retain the existing tree coverage outside of the developed area of the site. <br /> Staff is recommending a condition that the trees 10" in diameter or larger be inventoried at the <br /> development plan stage, and that they be preserved wherever possible. Protection of the tree coverage <br /> intended for preservation during construction would be a condition of approval. In the buffer area along <br /> County Road H2, the applicant is willing to either retain the oak woodland, supplement this area with <br /> additional tree plantings, or substitute berming and manicured landscaping, as the community desires. <br /> A decision on the type of treatment would be made at the development plan stage. The landscape plan • <br /> for the development portion of the site would also be submitted at the development plan stage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.