Agenda Packets - 1997/06/02 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Jim Erickson Glen Van Wormer John Hagen May 15, 1997 Page 2 and car wash traffic and to ensure that fast food vehicles continue to the east side of the building. Car wash customers will be required to park their cars, enter the convenience store, and purchase a pass, before queuing in the car wash traffic lane. They will not be permitted to enter the car wash traffic lane without a pass. This addresses the concern that there will be congestion at Driveway D where fast food and car wash traffic would interface. Delivery trucks will not use the Common Road and will make deliveries to the front door. • Provisions for trash removal - The developer feels that the location of trash storage facilities can be addressed in more detailed and refined versions of the site plan. It is appreciated that on-site circulation will require ample room to accommodate garbage trucks with 12 foot to 15 foot wheel bases. • Number of driveways on Silver Lake Road and need for right-turn deceleration lanes for driveways on Highway 10 - Anoka County commented on the number of driveways proposed for Silver Lake Road. This number has already been reduced from five to four by eliminating one of the driveways serving the senior citizen residential use. Future versions of the site plan will reflect this revision. Mn/DOT was asked about the need for right-turn deceleration and right-turn acceleration • lanes on Highway 10, both before and after completion of the traffic study. At a meeting held with Mn/DOT on April 16, the agency commented that deceleration and acceleration lanes would not be necessary. • Driveway D - There is disagreement between SEH and Biko Associates on operations at Driveway D. The traffic study did not present traffic assignments, and SEH, therefore, had to review computer print-outs (presented in the Appendix of the traffic study) to determine driveway volumes. The traffic study (and Appendix) reviewed by SEH is an early version of the report. Revisions were made to traffic assignments after the original traffic study was submitted and revised intersection capacity analyses were conducted. Because reported Levels of 110 Service for the intersections did not change between the original and revised capacity analysis runs, no mention was made of the revised traffic assignments.