My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/06/02
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/06/02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:15 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 2:54:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/2/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/2/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM • <br /> ■Si PAUL,MN MINNEAPOLIS,MN E Si CLOUD,MN CHIPPEWA FALLS. WI ❑ MADISON, WI <br /> TO: Jim Erickson, Planner, City of Mounds View <br /> Pamela Sheldon, City of Mounds View�>�/� <br /> FROM: Glen Van Wormer and John Hagen U " <br /> DATE: May 20, 1997 <br /> RE: Review of Site Traffic Impact Analysis <br /> Proposed PUD at Silver Lake Road and TH 10 <br /> Mounds View, Minnesota <br /> SEH No. A-MOUND9601.00 <br /> We had an opportunity to review the March 19, 1997 traffic impact analysis prepared by Biko <br /> Associates and summarized our comments in a May 9, 1997 memo. Biko Associates responded in <br /> a memo we received on May 16, 1997. <br /> We recognize this is a concept PUD and therefore discussed the site layout in our earlier report only <br /> in general terms. Our primary focus was the traffic report,which we were in general agreement with. <br /> Our general concern were a few on-site conflicts and circulation issues as well as the operation of <br /> Driveway D. We appreciated Biko Associates' response and hopefully we can clarify issues to assist <br /> the City in its deliberation over approval or modification of the concept PUD. <br /> On-Site Circulation <br /> We remain concerned over circulation for the car wash and fast food drive through facility. Having <br /> the fast food pickup window on the east side of the building raises more concerns than we had <br /> initially. Vehicles in the stacking lane will move from the south to the east sides of the building. <br /> Vehicles which are exiting the service station area towards the common drive south of the building <br /> will conflict with this drive through traffic, passing on its left. Having a drive through vehicle pull <br /> around the building and keep left of the exiting vehicle will be unusual. If, to further complicate the <br /> matter, another vehicle is entering the service station from the common road, the southbound exiting <br /> vehicle must pass between two vehicles coming northbound. Adding car wash traffic increases the <br /> conflict and potential confusion. Even with flexible stanchions, traffic flow will be interesting, <br /> especially at night. <br /> We also remain concerned over car wash traffic and some of the conflicts created by it. Whether the • <br /> motorists first get a pass from inside the building or not, they, and the fast food drive through traffic, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.