My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/06/02
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/06/02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:15 PM
Creation date
6/28/2018 2:54:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/2/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/2/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Jim Erickson and Pamela Sheldon <br /> May 20, 1997 • <br /> Page No. 3 <br /> Driveway D <br /> We appreciate that Biko Associates provided additional information relative to traffic volumes <br /> anticipated at Driveway D. The new volumes look significantly different from those in the original <br /> study and appear consistent with volumes in the development. We are in agreement that the average <br /> storage length for northbound traffic in the peak hour will be 225 feet which is further than the <br /> distance between the traffic signal on Highway 10 and Driveway D. Southbound motorists will not <br /> create a stacking problem but will be waiting for an opening in traffic. The alternative to use <br /> Driveway E is possible and will probably be used by some motorists. This however puts traffic <br /> through the conflict area near the drive through windows which we earlier addressed. As long as <br /> there is an opportunity for southbound traffic to bypass waiting southbound left turning traffic, there <br /> should not be a negative impact on traffic flow on southbound Silver Lake Road. Ramsey County <br /> should review this. <br /> Summary <br /> We remain concerned about some of the on-site conflicts previously mentioned in either this memo <br /> or the May 9 memo. Hopefully the comments will be used by the developer and his staff as the <br /> project proceeds. Should there be any questions, please feel free to call us. <br /> • <br /> sah . <br /> F:\PROJECTS\MOU ND\960I\M EMOS\ER ICKSON.52O <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.