Laserfiche WebLink
Silver Lake Commons Development Review <br /> Planning Case No. 487-97 <br /> . July 24, 1997 <br /> Page 3 <br /> pathway for drainage on the site, the applicant will grade a swale on the adjoining property to the <br /> north to route the water from that lot to the proposed detention pond in the southeast corner of <br /> the site. The property owner for 7800 Eastwood has agreed to allow the grading work to be <br /> done on their lot and to provide a drainage easement to protect the swale. The site also receives <br /> runoff from Eastwood Road via a bituminous swale that cuts across the southeast corner of this <br /> property. The existing swale is located where the detention pond is proposed to be built. The <br /> swale will be moved south to avoid the pond. Mr. Keehn finds the drainage and ponding to be <br /> acceptable and adequate to handle and treat 100-year stormwater runoff from the site. <br /> Acce§s <br /> Therelis one access into the site, which will be constructed between the existing Red Oak <br /> Apartments and the new rental townhomes, and which will connect to Highway 10. There are no <br /> access points on Eastwood Road. The existing access from Highway 10 between the two <br /> apartment buildings will be removed. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is <br /> requiring that the applicant add a deceleration lane for right turns off of Highway 10 going into <br /> the development and an acceleration lane for right-turns exiting the development. The letter from <br /> MnDOT is attached. To do this and to remove the existing driveway and culvert, the applicants <br /> will need to obtain a permit from MnDOT. The attached resolution includes a condition that the <br /> applicant obtain the required permit prior to the City issuing building permits for the project, and <br /> • post surety for these improvements, either with the City or with MnDOT, if so required by <br /> MnDOT. <br /> Parking <br /> The parking ratio required for multiple family residential units is 2.5 spaces per unit, with 1.0 <br /> space/unit in covered parking and 1.5 spaces/unit in surface parking. The total number of spaces <br /> required for this project would be 56 garages and 84 surface spaces, for a total of 140 spaces. <br /> The applicants proposed 57 covered garage spaces, one more than what is required for the <br /> proposed 56 units. The plan shows 65 surface parking stalls and sufficient room to add 19 stalls <br /> in areas set aside in green space, for a total of 84 spaces. The use of proof of parking was <br /> approved by the Planning Commission in Resolution No. 513-97, which granted a variance in the <br /> parking ratio. The variance allows the parking ratio to be 1 space/unit for covered parking and <br /> 1.15 spaces/unit for surface parking, with a requirement that the applicant will build the additional <br /> parking spaces if it is determined by the City that the additional parking spaces are needed later. <br /> Landscaping and Fencing: <br /> The landscape plan submitted by the applicant has been reviewed by Rick Wriskey, the City <br /> Forester. Mr. Wriskey made a number of recommendations and suggestions which were <br /> addressed by the applicant in a revised landscape plan, dated 7/24/97. The applicant has shown a <br /> desire to retain as many significant tress as possible on the vacant lots. Staff has included a <br /> condition that these trees be fenced during construction to protect fragile root systems and <br /> prevent heavy machinery from being place within the dripline of the trees. <br /> A variety of planting materials will be used to supplement the existing tree cover and shrubbery on <br /> the Red Oak property. Flowering Crabapple trees will be added.in front of the Red Oak buildings <br />