Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> interoffice • <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> to: Chuck Whiting <br /> from: Mary Saarion <br /> subject: Synopsis of Community Task Force Meeting <br /> date: August 29, 1997 <br /> The Mounds View Community Task Force met Thursday, August 28 along with members of the <br /> City Council to further discuss plans for the Community Center. <br /> DESIGN: <br /> Architects Dean and Dave from WAI introduced a new design without VB Digs. Members <br /> discussed air quality, kitchen facilities, youth areas, and entrance areas. Because the Bel Rae has <br /> such an odor of smoke, members were concerned about the air quality and smell of the <br /> community center. Dave and Dean assured members that the construction of the ceiling and <br /> ductwork will provide for excellent air quality and no residual smell. <br /> The kitchen is currently empty except for installation stages of a new exhaust hood. Members • <br /> asked where the appliances were and Dave and Dean explained that they were being stored in the <br /> corner of the building for now. They will be re-installed when the improvements to the kitchen <br /> walls and floor have been completed. <br /> There was discussion regarding points of entries and how secure the building would be. It was <br /> noted that one entry from Bronson and one entry from the parking lot off Edgewood would <br /> provide two entries for the School District and Community Center portion. Children's Home <br /> Society have their own secured entry. <br /> Areas for the youth center were discussed and members liked the idea that the area will be open, <br /> that the area is flexible and versatile, encouraging table game activity and interactive play. A <br /> closed room was rejected because most other Community Centers have found that the kids do not <br /> use such areas and these areas are difficult to supervise. Glass viewing into the gymnasium from <br /> the youth area will provide for observation of gymnasium activities by spectators and supervisors. <br /> The group discussed preference for the addition to be tilted or square. It was the majority's <br /> opinion that the tilted affect provided more character to the building rather than a traditionally <br /> square design. It was predicted that little or no cost would result from the tilted design. It was <br /> also decided by consensus that an option for parking to the south rather than the east would <br /> provide possibilities for partnerships with other entities in the future. • <br /> Operational costs were discussed. It was suggested that office areas are needed for staff members <br />