Laserfiche WebLink
City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> October 3, 1997 <br /> Page 2 <br /> connected by a leased telephone line; for the other systems, we assumed that we would need to • <br /> purchase a new computer file server in year one and year six, and that the software purchased <br /> would need to be upgraded to a new platform in year six at the same cost as the initial purchase. <br /> While this may not be needed, it provides a conservative method to evaluate the products in <br /> relationship to LOGIS. <br /> LOGIS - after first contacting them, they revised their pricing structure with discounts in the first <br /> several years. They recommended looking at a ten year period to get a true picture of the actual <br /> Information System's cost. Overall, LOGIS appears to be a provide a good product, however, it <br /> still appears to be very costly. In addition, several of the cities that we contacted who use LOGIS <br /> were exploring other options; due to LOGIS's pricing practice of allocating its costs between all <br /> cities on their system, as the number of users decreases, the cost to the other users will likely <br /> increase. While the offset should also be true (more cities should lower costs), LOGIS has not <br /> added any new cities in the last several years. In addition, LOGIS indicated that it intends to <br /> change some of its programs within the next several years which would require additional <br /> conversions and training. Overall, the software does not appear to be in the best long term <br /> interest of the City. <br /> Banyon - a low cost system without many capabilities or enhancements. Enhancements and <br /> support are lacking and most cities we contacted indicated that as a result, they are looking for <br /> new software. Also, most cities indicated that they have been trying to obtain a date when a • <br /> windows product would be available but have not receive any indication other than that it is <br /> being developed. This would likely result in us being required to use the existing product <br /> initially and then to convert to a new product in the next several years; this would require <br /> additional training. Overall, the software does not appear to be in the best long term choice for <br /> Mounds View. <br /> Micro Arizala. This firm has few customers in our region. Roseville presently uses them but has <br /> indicated that they are looking for a new system. The product appears to be similar to Banyon in <br /> that it has few options or enhancements. We also had to contact them numerous times before <br /> they would return our phone calls which appears to confirm some of the comments we heard <br /> relating to poor customer service. Overall, the software does not appear to be in the best long <br /> term choice for Mounds View. <br /> Computer Management Systems. This firm has a large presence in Iowa and Wisconsin and <br /> recently purchased another vendor that had a large presence in Iowa, Wisconsin and Minnesota. <br /> They are in the process of combining their product lines and will have two different products to <br /> offer, one being written in COBOL (referred to as CMS in the attachments) and the other in a <br /> windows environment(referred to as Pace in the attachments). Overall, they have in excess of <br /> 750 users within our region. All the comments we received on the windows product were vary <br /> favorable. The product should have the longest life of any of the products we looked which <br /> should reduce future costs for purchasing a new product, and training and converting to such a • <br /> product. The product also has the most capabilities which should provide the users <br />