My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/10/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/10/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:23 PM
Creation date
6/29/2018 6:46:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/6/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/6/1997
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mari'4110 �.Iairic:c <br /> Spring L.a .-c Rd. Cty. Rd. I Project <br /> Mayor McCarty and Council members. <br /> The communities I called regarding special assessments are listed below. In every <br /> case I spoke with an indil,itivai who handles the assessments. What I found out is that <br /> every municipality has its own formula. The below figures and comments can only be <br /> applied as a rule of thumb. a`viien I did my polling i lidley's assessor was On vacation until <br /> Sept. 22. 1997. Because I did not confirm that information it was not included in the <br /> comments below. <br /> Communities called: <br /> White Lear Lake: Fridley <br /> New Brighton Blaine <br /> Spring Lake Park Coon Rapids <br /> Roseville Arden kills <br /> TIno Takes <br /> Comments: <br /> .F 25% of Street construction (charged by front footage) Pius storm construction {charged <br /> by acreage) less any previous storm assessments. A typical 100' lot is S1700 plus S500- <br /> S600 for storm construction. <br /> • * Their charter prevents assessments unless initiated by the residents. <br /> * Approximately 5300.00 per lot. spread over 3 years. That is the maximum benefit they <br /> feel will hold up in court. <br /> * S2100 per lot. Additional funds are pulled from the general tax. levy. Their intent is to <br /> pull funds from the whole community, which brings in a reimbursement from those <br /> residents who benefited from previous road construction but where never assessed. <br /> 4` $28.00 per front footage less any previous assessments. This particular city hires an <br /> independent appraiser to keep the assessments in line with the property values. <br /> 25% for surfacing and iuii°'o of curb and gutter. This city previously worked with an <br /> appraiser, but no longer feel it is necessary because their formula is one that works for <br /> them. <br /> A :_tic:i lot (301`,. is assessed $2-4)0. Certain roads i_ i.e.. \I.S..A.. county roads) are <br /> chargcu 1;2 of a t picai lot price. <br /> '" Arden Hills- 50%. <br /> As you know I would like the residents to feel the full monetary impact of the turn <br /> back r;ontry. This fund is set aside by Ramsey County to repair the roads at no assessment <br /> to those living along the roads. in keeping with mat spirit. in which the fund was intended. <br /> the assessment calculations should he directly: proportional to the improvements that are <br /> over and above the improvements provided by Ramsey County. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.